RFCI vs. SBIO
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO).
RFCI and SBIO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFCI is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016. SBIO is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the S-Network Medical Breakthroughs Index. It was launched on Dec 31, 2014.
Performance
RFCI vs. SBIO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFCI vs. SBIO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | -0.19% | 6.85% | 2.64% | 5.97% | -9.27% | -1.48% | 6.48% | 8.69% | -1.30% | 3.14% |
SBIO ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF | 3.20% | 55.07% | 3.81% | 8.68% | -28.08% | -17.55% | 21.17% | 50.30% | -11.81% | 45.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFCI achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than SBIO's 3.20% return.
RFCI
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- 4.23%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- —
SBIO
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 36.23%
- 1Y
- 95.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFCI vs. SBIO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFCI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFCI vs. SBIO — Risk / Return Rank
RFCI
SBIO
RFCI vs. SBIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFCI | SBIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 2.92 | -1.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 3.57 | -2.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.45 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 5.66 | -4.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.09 | 19.94 | -14.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFCI | SBIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 2.92 | -1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.05 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.23 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFCI and SBIO is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RFCI vs. SBIO - Dividend Comparison
RFCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, while SBIO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | 4.51% | 4.55% | 4.30% | 3.55% | 2.26% | 3.45% | 2.04% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.03% | 1.97% |
SBIO ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.55% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 2.79% | 1.77% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RFCI vs. SBIO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFCI drawdown since its inception was -14.18%, smaller than the maximum SBIO drawdown of -63.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCI and SBIO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFCI | SBIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.18% | -63.06% | +48.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.61% | -15.08% | +12.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.46% | -53.67% | +40.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.69% | -13.79% | +12.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -28.70% | +25.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | 4.28% | -3.46% |
Volatility
RFCI vs. SBIO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) is 1.54%, while ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that RFCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFCI | SBIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 12.61% | -11.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | 22.09% | -19.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04% | 33.43% | -29.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.10% | 33.55% | -28.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.96% | 33.34% | -28.38% |