RFCI vs. ENFR
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR).
RFCI and ENFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFCI is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016. ENFR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2013.
Performance
RFCI vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFCI vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | -0.21% | 6.85% | 2.64% | 5.97% | -9.27% | -1.48% | 6.48% | 8.69% | -1.30% | 3.14% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 22.85% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFCI achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 22.85% return.
RFCI
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 4.13%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 22.85%
- 6M
- 20.70%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 28.68%
- 5Y*
- 23.59%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFCI vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFCI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFCI vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
RFCI
ENFR
RFCI vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFCI | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.25 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 1.63 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.25 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.49 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | 4.94 | +0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFCI | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.25 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 1.24 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.34 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFCI and ENFR is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RFCI vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
RFCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than ENFR's 4.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | 4.51% | 4.55% | 4.30% | 3.55% | 2.26% | 3.45% | 2.04% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.03% | 1.97% | 0.00% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.02% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
Drawdowns
RFCI vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFCI drawdown since its inception was -14.18%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCI and ENFR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFCI | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.18% | -68.28% | +54.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.61% | -14.80% | +12.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.46% | -20.29% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -2.18% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -16.16% | +12.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 4.47% | -3.66% |
Volatility
RFCI vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) is 1.54%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that RFCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFCI | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 3.72% | -2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | 10.21% | -7.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04% | 17.91% | -13.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.10% | 19.18% | -14.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.96% | 24.74% | -19.78% |