REXC vs. BILD

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

REXC (Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF) and BILD (Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REXC is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index, while BILD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Macquarie. REXC is passively managed, while BILD is actively managed. At a -0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REXC charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BILD.

Performance

REXC vs. BILD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC) and Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

REXC

• 1D: -5.32%
• 1M: -17.09%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BILD

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.70%
• 6M: 9.15%
• YTD: 10.31%
• 1Y: 18.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REXC vs. BILD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF	-16.36%
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF	-0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between REXC and BILD is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2026	-0.00

Return for Risk

REXC vs. BILD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REXC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BILD

BILD Risk / Return Rank: 62
BILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
BILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
BILD Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BILD Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REXC vs. BILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC) and Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	REXC	BILD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.66	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.25	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.00	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.27	—

Drawdowns

REXC vs. BILD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REXC drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, which is greater than BILD's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REXC and BILD.

Drawdown Indicators

	REXC	BILD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.43%	-14.78%	-13.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.43%	-2.33%	-26.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.62%	-3.70%	-6.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	REXC	BILD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.34%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.38%	10.95%	+39.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.38%	13.11%	+37.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.38%	13.11%	+37.27%

REXC vs. BILD - Expense Ratio Comparison

REXC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BILD's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

REXC vs. BILD - Dividend Comparison

REXC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BILD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF	4.68%	3.05%	5.53%	0.52%
REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REXC and BILD in my portfolio?

REXC and BILD have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, REXC or BILD?

On fees, BILD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, REXC or BILD?

BILD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for REXC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REXC or BILD?

BILD has the higher dividend yield at 4.68%, compared with 0.00% for REXC.

What is the main difference between REXC and BILD?

REXC is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while BILD is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Macquarie. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for REXC and 0.49% for BILD.