BILD vs. IGF
BILD (Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BILD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Macquarie, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index (Net). BILD is actively managed, while IGF is passively managed. Over the past year, BILD returned 16.87% vs 18.50% for IGF. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BILD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.
Performance
BILD vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILD achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly lower than IGF's 9.70% return.
BILD
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- 7.50%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 16.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGF
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 18.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
BILD vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF | 7.50% | 21.08% | -2.68% | 3.73% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 9.70% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 4.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILD and IGF is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2023 | 0.80 |
The correlation between BILD and IGF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
BILD vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BILD
IGF
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
BILD
IGF
Industrials
BILD
IGF
Energy
BILD
IGF
Real Estate
BILD
IGF
Communication Services
BILD
IGF
-
Basic Materials
BILD
-
IGF
-
Consumer Cyclical
BILD
-
IGF
-
Consumer Defensive
BILD
-
IGF
-
Financial Services
BILD
-
IGF
-
Healthcare
BILD
-
IGF
-
Technology
BILD
-
IGF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILD vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank
BILD
IGF
BILD vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BILD | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.31 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 3.17 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 8.98 | -1.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BILD vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILD drawdown since its inception was -14.78%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILD and IGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILD | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.78% | -58.33% | +43.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.05% | -5.87% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.82% | -2.96% | -1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -11.85% | +8.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 2.06% | +0.29% |
Volatility
BILD vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) is 2.99%, while iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that BILD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILD | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 3.38% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.89% | 8.73% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.88% | 10.58% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 13.97% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 16.82% | -3.66% |
BILD vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
BILD vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
BILD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than IGF's 2.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF | 5.81% | 3.05% | 5.53% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.91% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BILD and IGF have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGF has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to BILD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILD dropped -14.78% vs IGF's -58.33%.
On 1-year performance, IGF leads with 18.50% vs 16.87% for BILD. On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, BILD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IGF has performed better with a 18.50% return vs 16.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BILD.
BILD has the higher dividend yield at 5.81%, compared with 2.91% for IGF.
BILD is categorized as Energy Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Macquarie and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BILD and 0.39% for IGF.
IGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BILD and IGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer