Correlation
The correlation between BILD and IGF is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
BILD vs. IGF
Compare and contrast key facts about Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF).
BILD and IGF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BILD is an actively managed fund by Macquarie. It was launched on Nov 28, 2023. IGF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BILD or IGF.
Performance
BILD vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
BILD:
0.85
IGF:
1.67
BILD:
1.05
IGF:
2.06
BILD:
1.14
IGF:
1.29
BILD:
0.72
IGF:
2.49
BILD:
1.51
IGF:
9.50
BILD:
7.06%
IGF:
2.29%
BILD:
15.21%
IGF:
14.36%
BILD:
-14.78%
IGF:
-58.33%
BILD:
-1.08%
IGF:
-0.68%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BILD having a 12.11% return and IGF slightly higher at 12.32%.
BILD
12.11%
1.50%
4.90%
12.78%
N/A
N/A
N/A
IGF
12.32%
3.69%
7.31%
23.70%
7.70%
11.59%
6.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BILD vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.46% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BILD vs. IGF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BILD
IGF
BILD vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
BILD vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
BILD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than IGF's 2.86% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF | 5.09% | 5.53% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.86% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.99% | 3.24% | 3.00% |
Drawdowns
BILD vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILD drawdown since its inception was -14.78%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILD and IGF.
Loading data...
Volatility
BILD vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.49%. This indicates that BILD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...