BILD vs. LNGX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BILD (Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF) and LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. BILD is actively managed, while LNGX is passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BILD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LNGX.

Performance

BILD vs. LNGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILD achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly lower than LNGX's 19.55% return.

BILD

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: -2.47%
• YTD: 7.77%
• 6M: 7.29%
• 1Y: 14.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LNGX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -6.07%
• YTD: 19.55%
• 6M: 16.11%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BILD vs. LNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF	7.77%	0.75%
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF	19.55%	5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BILD and LNGX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

BILD vs. LNGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILD

BILD Risk / Return Rank: 41
BILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
BILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
BILD Omega Ratio Rank: 37
BILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
BILD Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILD vs. LNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BILD	LNGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.31	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BILD	LNGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	2.03	-1.13

Drawdowns

BILD vs. LNGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILD drawdown since its inception was -14.78%, roughly equal to the maximum LNGX drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILD and LNGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BILD	LNGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.78%	-14.31%	-0.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.58%	-12.03%	+7.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.70%	-4.32%	+0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BILD	LNGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.13%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.91%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.78%	24.75%	-13.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.23%	24.75%	-11.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.23%	24.75%	-11.52%

BILD vs. LNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LNGX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

BILD vs. LNGX - Dividend Comparison

BILD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than LNGX's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF	2.85%	3.05%	5.53%	0.52%
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF	0.22%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BILD and LNGX in my portfolio?

BILD and LNGX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BILD or LNGX?

On fees, LNGX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BILD or LNGX?

LNGX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BILD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BILD or LNGX?

BILD has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.22% for LNGX.

What is the main difference between BILD and LNGX?

They also come from different issuers: Macquarie and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BILD and 0.45% for LNGX.