PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REW vs. OOQB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

REW vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

REW vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REW achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than OOQB's -28.69% return.


REW

1D
-8.56%
1M
7.63%
YTD
14.28%
6M
8.22%
1Y
-47.23%
3Y*
-35.55%
5Y*
-31.49%
10Y*
-40.52%

OOQB

1D
5.72%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
-28.69%
6M
-45.98%
1Y
-14.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


REW vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison

REW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

REW vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REW
REW Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
REW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REW Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
REW Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
REW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
REW Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

OOQB
OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REW vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REWOOQBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.88

-0.25

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.21

0.04

-1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.01

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

-0.30

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.84

-0.66

-0.17

REW vs. OOQB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REW Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the OOQB Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REW and OOQB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REWOOQBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.88

-0.25

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.74

-0.57

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between REW and OOQB is -0.68. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

REW vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison

REW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than OOQB's 13.89% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
REW
ProShares UltraShort Technology
4.98%6.69%5.68%5.97%0.65%0.00%0.27%1.80%0.51%
OOQB
Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF
13.89%9.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

REW vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REW drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than OOQB's maximum drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REW and OOQB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


REWOOQBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-53.44%

-46.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.44%

-53.44%

-14.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-50.78%

-49.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.76%

-19.94%

-66.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.52%

23.98%

+32.54%

Volatility

REW vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) is 16.49%, while Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) has a volatility of 18.69%. This indicates that REW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OOQB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


REWOOQBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.49%

18.69%

-2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.90%

46.05%

-13.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.94%

59.59%

-5.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.30%

61.96%

-10.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.53%

61.96%

-13.43%