PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
REW vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

REW vs. XLK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

REW (ProShares UltraShort Technology) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REW is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (-200%), while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, REW returned -45.16%/yr vs 25.84%/yr for XLK. At a correlation of -0.94, they often move in opposite directions. REW charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.

Performance

REW vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REW achieves a -48.44% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 36.47% return. Over the past 10 years, REW has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of -45.16%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.84% annualized return.

REW

1D
2.13%
1M
-32.71%
YTD
-48.44%
6M
-47.77%
1Y
-65.29%
3Y*
-47.19%
5Y*
-40.21%
10Y*
-45.16%

XLK

1D
-1.00%
1M
21.09%
YTD
36.47%
6M
35.71%
1Y
66.93%
3Y*
33.90%
5Y*
23.83%
10Y*
25.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REW vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REW
ProShares UltraShort Technology		-48.44%-43.15%-33.70%-61.35%65.72%-53.61%-71.34%-56.83%-10.02%-49.11%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF		36.47%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between REW and XLK is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2007

-0.94

The correlation between REW and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares UltraShort Technology

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

Often compared with REW:
REW vs. TECSREW vs. ^VVIXREW vs. VXXREW vs. SPYREW vs. ^GSPCREW vs. SSGREW vs. FTEC
Often compared with XLK:
XLK vs. QQQXLK vs. VGTXLK vs. SMHXLK vs. SPYXLK vs. FTECXLK vs. IYWXLK vs. XLE

Return for Risk

REW vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
REW
REW Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
REW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REW Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
REW Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
REW Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
REW Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REW vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

REWXLKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.56

3.24

-4.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-3.03

3.92

-6.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.69

1.52

-0.83

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

4.22

-5.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-2.00

14.16

-16.16

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REW vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REW Sharpe Ratio is -1.56, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REW and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

REWXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.56

3.24

-4.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.78

0.96

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.93

1.06

-1.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.79

0.42

-1.21

Drawdowns

REW vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REW drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than XLK's maximum drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REW and XLK.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

REWXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-82.05%

-17.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.25%

-15.92%

-50.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.76%

-25.66%

-61.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.62%

-33.56%

-60.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.79%

-33.56%

-66.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-1.00%

-98.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.88%

-34.96%

-51.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.60%

4.74%

+27.86%

Volatility

REW vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) has a higher volatility of 14.84% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 6.98%. This indicates that REW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

REWXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.84%

6.98%

+7.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.14%

16.68%

+17.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.11%

20.82%

+21.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.64%

24.90%

+26.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.83%

24.49%

+24.34%

REW vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

REW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

REW vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

REW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, more than XLK's 0.39% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REW
ProShares UltraShort Technology		11.04%6.69%5.68%5.97%0.65%0.00%0.27%1.80%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF		0.39%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

REW and XLK have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REW has higher volatility (14.84%) compared to XLK (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REW dropped -99.99% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.84% vs -45.16% for REW. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 6.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.84% return vs -45.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for REW.

REW has the higher dividend yield at 11.04%, compared with 0.39% for XLK.

REW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. REW tracks Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (-200%), while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for REW and 0.08% for XLK.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs -1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REW and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer