PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REW vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

REW vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REW achieves a -48.44% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.79% return. Over the past 10 years, REW has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of -45.16%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.65% annualized return.


REW

1D
2.13%
1M
-32.71%
YTD
-48.44%
6M
-47.77%
1Y
-65.29%
3Y*
-47.19%
5Y*
-40.21%
10Y*
-45.16%

^GSPC

1D
0.41%
1M
4.48%
YTD
10.79%
6M
10.60%
1Y
27.02%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
13.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REW vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REW
ProShares UltraShort Technology
-48.44%-43.15%-33.70%-61.35%65.72%-53.61%-71.34%-56.83%-10.02%-49.11%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.79%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between REW and ^GSPC is -0.86, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2007

-0.84

The correlation between REW and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.90 to -0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REW vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REW
REW Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
REW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REW Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
REW Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
REW Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
REW Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REW vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REW^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.69

1.41

-0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

2.98

-3.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.00

13.78

-15.78

REW vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REW Sharpe Ratio is -1.56, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REW and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REW^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.56

2.28

-3.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.78

0.74

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.93

0.76

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.79

0.47

-1.26

Drawdowns

REW vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REW drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REW and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REW^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-56.78%

-43.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.25%

-9.10%

-57.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.76%

-18.90%

-67.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.62%

-25.43%

-68.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.79%

-33.92%

-65.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-0.33%

-99.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.88%

-10.72%

-76.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.60%

1.97%

+30.63%

Volatility

REW vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) has a higher volatility of 14.84% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 2.88%. This indicates that REW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REW^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.84%

2.88%

+11.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.14%

9.00%

+25.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.11%

11.89%

+30.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.64%

16.90%

+34.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.83%

18.06%

+30.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


REW and ^GSPC have a correlation of -0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REW has higher volatility (14.84%) compared to ^GSPC (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REW dropped -99.99% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs -1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REW and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer