REW vs. ^GSPC
REW (ProShares UltraShort Technology) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (-200%), while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, REW returned -43.85%/yr vs 13.27%/yr for ^GSPC. At a correlation of -0.84, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
REW vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REW achieves a -39.78% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, REW has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of -43.85%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.27% annualized return.
REW
- 1D
- 4.43%
- 1M
- 8.43%
- 6M
- -38.44%
- YTD
- -39.78%
- 1Y
- -51.65%
- 3Y*
- -41.91%
- 5Y*
- -36.52%
- 10Y*
- -43.85%
^GSPC
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 8.49%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 20.28%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.73%
- 10Y*
- 13.27%
REW vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REW ProShares UltraShort Technology | -39.78% | -43.15% | -33.70% | -61.35% | 65.72% | -53.61% | -71.34% | -56.83% | -10.02% | -49.11% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 10.05% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 26.89% | 16.26% | 28.88% | -6.24% | 19.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between REW and ^GSPC is -0.85, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007 | -0.84 |
The correlation between REW and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.90 to -0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REW vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
REW
^GSPC
REW vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REW | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.29 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 2.24 | -3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.75 | 9.71 | -11.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REW vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REW drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REW and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REW | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -56.78% | -43.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.10% | -9.10% | -51.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.76% | -18.90% | -67.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.62% | -25.43% | -68.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.74% | -33.92% | -65.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -1.00% | -98.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.94% | -10.70% | -76.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.45% | 2.09% | +27.36% |
Volatility
REW vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) has a higher volatility of 19.92% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.25%. This indicates that REW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REW | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.92% | 3.25% | +16.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.41% | 10.00% | +32.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.67% | 12.56% | +37.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.97% | 17.00% | +35.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.45% | 18.05% | +31.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REW and ^GSPC have a correlation of -0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REW has higher volatility (19.92%) compared to ^GSPC (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REW dropped -99.99% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REW and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer