REW vs. LINT
REW (ProShares UltraShort Technology) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. REW is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.55, they often move in opposite directions. REW charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
REW vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REW achieves a -43.64% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 753.04% return.
REW
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- -43.64%
- 6M
- -41.62%
- 1Y
- -57.85%
- 3Y*
- -45.39%
- 5Y*
- -37.94%
- 10Y*
- -45.33%
LINT
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 6.51%
- YTD
- 753.04%
- 6M
- 785.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REW vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
REW ProShares UltraShort Technology | -43.64% | -6.41% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 753.04% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between REW and LINT is -0.55, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REW vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank
REW
LINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
REW vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REW | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.00 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REW vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REW drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REW and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REW | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -49.54% | -50.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -12.02% | -87.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.90% | -20.37% | -66.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.52% | — | — |
Volatility
REW vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REW | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.39% | 167.69% | -120.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.56% | 167.69% | -115.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.29% | 167.69% | -118.40% |
REW vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
REW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
REW vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
REW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.84%, more than LINT's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.32% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REW ProShares UltraShort Technology | 8.84% | 6.69% | 5.68% | 5.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.27% | 1.80% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REW and LINT have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REW is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REW is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.
REW has the higher dividend yield at 8.84%, compared with 0.32% for LINT.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for REW and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for REW and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer