REW vs. BITU
REW (ProShares UltraShort Technology) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REW is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (-200%), while BITU is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, REW returned -65.29% vs -73.07% for BITU. At a correlation of -0.39, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
REW vs. BITU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REW achieves a -48.44% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -52.92% return.
REW
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -32.71%
- YTD
- -48.44%
- 6M
- -47.77%
- 1Y
- -65.29%
- 3Y*
- -47.19%
- 5Y*
- -40.21%
- 10Y*
- -45.16%
BITU
- 1D
- -5.58%
- 1M
- -34.84%
- YTD
- -52.92%
- 6M
- -59.11%
- 1Y
- -73.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REW vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
REW ProShares UltraShort Technology | -48.44% | -43.15% | -23.04% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | -52.92% | -37.07% | 37.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between REW and BITU is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | -0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REW vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank
REW
BITU
REW vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REW | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.69 | 0.84 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.93 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.00 | -1.47 | -0.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REW | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.56 | -0.84 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.79 | -0.35 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
REW vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REW drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than BITU's maximum drawdown of -78.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REW and BITU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REW | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -78.94% | -21.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.25% | -78.94% | +12.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -78.94% | -21.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.88% | -34.49% | -52.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.60% | 49.84% | -17.24% |
Volatility
REW vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) is 14.84%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that REW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REW | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.84% | 18.99% | -4.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.14% | 69.41% | -35.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.11% | 87.00% | -44.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.64% | 97.45% | -45.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.83% | 97.45% | -48.62% |
REW vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both REW and BITU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
REW vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison
REW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, less than BITU's 83.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | 83.36% | 50.23% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REW ProShares UltraShort Technology | 11.04% | 6.69% | 5.68% | 5.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.27% | 1.80% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REW and BITU have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITU has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to REW (14.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REW dropped -99.99% vs BITU's -78.94%.
On 1-year performance, REW leads with -65.29% vs -73.07% for BITU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, REW has been the lower-risk option at 14.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, REW has performed better with a -65.29% return vs -73.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REW and BITU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
BITU has the higher dividend yield at 83.36%, compared with 11.04% for REW.
REW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. REW tracks Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (-200%), while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross.
BITU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.84 vs -1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REW and BITU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer