REVS vs. PWV
REVS (Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF) and PWV (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - REVS tracks the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index while PWV tracks the Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, REVS returned 11.72%/yr vs 14.08%/yr for PWV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REVS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PWV.
Performance
REVS vs. PWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REVS achieves a 12.34% return, which is significantly lower than PWV's 16.55% return.
REVS
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 12.34%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 25.40%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- —
PWV
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 4.04%
- YTD
- 16.55%
- 6M
- 15.68%
- 1Y
- 28.10%
- 3Y*
- 21.56%
- 5Y*
- 14.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
REVS vs. PWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF | 12.34% | 16.80% | 16.36% | 13.46% | -6.20% | 28.52% | 1.37% | 7.27% |
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 16.55% | 19.65% | 14.48% | 10.36% | -1.16% | 29.06% | -3.77% | 8.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between REVS and PWV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between REVS and PWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REVS vs. PWV — Risk / Return Rank
REVS
PWV
REVS vs. PWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REVS | PWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.52 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 6.96 | -3.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.35 | 23.27 | -9.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REVS vs. PWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REVS drawdown since its inception was -37.85%, smaller than the maximum PWV drawdown of -49.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REVS and PWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REVS | PWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.85% | -49.04% | +11.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.94% | -4.05% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.37% | -14.31% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.04% | -16.36% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | 0.00% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -9.47% | +4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 1.21% | +0.70% |
Volatility
REVS vs. PWV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) is 3.09%, while Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that REVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REVS | PWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 3.42% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.45% | 7.08% | +1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 9.58% | +1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 14.34% | +0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 17.15% | +1.92% |
REVS vs. PWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
REVS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than PWV's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
REVS vs. PWV - Dividend Comparison
REVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than PWV's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 1.72% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.16% | 2.29% | 1.89% | 2.66% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.55% | 2.35% | 2.42% |
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF | 1.90% | 2.13% | 1.89% | 2.49% | 2.46% | 1.18% | 27.75% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REVS and PWV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWV has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to REVS (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REVS dropped -37.85% vs PWV's -49.04%.
On 5-year performance, PWV leads with 14.08% vs 11.72% for REVS. On fees, REVS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, REVS has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PWV has performed better with a 14.08% return vs 11.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REVS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PWV.
REVS has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.72% for PWV.
REVS tracks Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index, while PWV tracks Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX). They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for REVS and 0.58% for PWV.
PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REVS and PWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer