REVS vs. SCHD
REVS (Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REVS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, REVS returned 11.96%/yr vs 8.77%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REVS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
REVS vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REVS achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.24% return.
REVS
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 6M
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 26.32%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 6M
- 16.44%
- 1Y
- 24.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
REVS vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF | 12.15% | 16.80% | 16.36% | 13.46% | -6.20% | 28.52% | 1.37% | 7.27% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.24% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 7.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between REVS and SCHD is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between REVS and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
REVS vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REVS
SCHD
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
REVS
SCHD
Technology
REVS
SCHD
Industrials
REVS
SCHD
Healthcare
REVS
SCHD
Communication Services
REVS
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
REVS
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
REVS
SCHD
Energy
REVS
SCHD
Utilities
REVS
SCHD
Real Estate
REVS
SCHD
-
Basic Materials
REVS
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REVS vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
REVS
SCHD
REVS vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REVS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.39 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 5.24 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.86 | 12.71 | +1.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REVS vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REVS drawdown since its inception was -37.85%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REVS and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REVS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.85% | -33.37% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.94% | -4.61% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.37% | -16.13% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.04% | -16.85% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -2.86% | +1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -3.31% | -1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 1.90% | 0.00% |
Volatility
REVS vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) is 3.17%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that REVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REVS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 3.58% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 7.74% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.55% | 11.09% | +0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 14.36% | +0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 16.73% | +2.35% |
REVS vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
REVS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
REVS vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
REVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than SCHD's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF | 1.90% | 2.13% | 1.89% | 2.49% | 2.46% | 1.18% | 27.75% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.31% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REVS and SCHD have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to REVS (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REVS dropped -37.85% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, REVS leads with 11.96% vs 8.77% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, REVS has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, REVS has performed better with a 11.96% return vs 8.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for REVS.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 1.90% for REVS.
REVS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. REVS tracks Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for REVS and 0.06% for SCHD.
REVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REVS and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer