REVS vs. MFVL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

REVS (Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. REVS is passively managed, while MFVL is actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. REVS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFVL.

Performance

REVS vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REVS achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's 0.39% return.

REVS

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 3.64%
• YTD: 11.50%
• 6M: 12.18%
• 1Y: 26.29%
• 3Y*: 18.50%
• 5Y*: 11.10%
• 10Y*: —

MFVL

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REVS vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF	11.50%	0.97%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	0.39%	1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between REVS and MFVL is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025	0.61

Return for Risk

REVS vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REVS

REVS Risk / Return Rank: 72
REVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
REVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
REVS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
REVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
REVS Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REVS vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REVS	MFVL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.81	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.90	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REVS	MFVL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.31	+0.37

Drawdowns

REVS vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REVS drawdown since its inception was -37.85%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REVS and MFVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	REVS	MFVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.85%	-7.03%	-30.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-3.29%	+3.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.66%	-2.42%	-2.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	REVS	MFVL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.50%	12.15%	-0.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.91%	12.15%	+2.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.13%	12.15%	+6.98%

REVS vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

REVS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than MFVL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

REVS vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison

REVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF	1.91%	2.13%	1.89%	2.49%	2.46%	1.18%	27.75%	0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REVS and MFVL in my portfolio?

REVS and MFVL have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, REVS or MFVL?

On fees, REVS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, REVS or MFVL?

REVS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFVL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REVS or MFVL?

REVS has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.

What is the main difference between REVS and MFVL?

They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for REVS and 0.50% for MFVL.