REVS vs. ABEQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

REVS (Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF) and ABEQ (Absolute Select Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. REVS is passively managed, while ABEQ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, REVS returned 11.10%/yr vs 7.06%/yr for ABEQ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. REVS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ABEQ.

Performance

REVS vs. ABEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REVS achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than ABEQ's 3.44% return.

REVS

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 3.64%
• YTD: 11.50%
• 6M: 12.18%
• 1Y: 26.29%
• 3Y*: 18.50%
• 5Y*: 11.10%
• 10Y*: —

ABEQ

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -0.34%
• YTD: 3.44%
• 6M: 3.43%
• 1Y: 8.87%
• 3Y*: 11.57%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REVS vs. ABEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF	11.50%	16.80%	16.36%	13.46%	-6.20%	28.52%	0.51%
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF	3.44%	15.32%	12.68%	4.63%	-1.00%	12.49%	2.51%

Correlation

The correlation between REVS and ABEQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2020	0.77

The correlation between REVS and ABEQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

REVS vs. ABEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	REVS	ABEQ
Financial Services	20.7%	24.8%
Technology	12.3%	4.4%
Healthcare	12.2%	7.2%
Industrials	12.1%	8.3%
Communication Services	8.4%	3.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.5%	10.9%
Energy	6.5%	10.3%
Utilities	4.4%	1.4%
Real Estate	4.3%	-
Basic Materials	4.0%	17.0%

Return for Risk

REVS vs. ABEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REVS

REVS Risk / Return Rank: 72
REVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
REVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
REVS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
REVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
REVS Martin Ratio Rank: 74

ABEQ

ABEQ Risk / Return Rank: 25
ABEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
ABEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
ABEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 26
ABEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
ABEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REVS vs. ABEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REVS	ABEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	1.00	+1.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	1.46	+1.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.18	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.81	1.13	+2.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.90	2.78	+11.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REVS vs. ABEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REVS Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the ABEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REVS and ABEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REVS	ABEQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	1.00	+1.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.66	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.56	+0.12

Drawdowns

REVS vs. ABEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REVS drawdown since its inception was -37.85%, which is greater than ABEQ's maximum drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REVS and ABEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	REVS	ABEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.85%	-27.82%	-10.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.94%	-7.89%	+0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.37%	-7.95%	-8.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.04%	-17.26%	-0.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-7.43%	+7.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.66%	-4.07%	-0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	3.20%	-1.30%

Volatility

REVS vs. ABEQ - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) at 1.98%. This indicates that REVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REVS	ABEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	1.98%	+0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.46%	6.69%	+1.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.50%	8.91%	+2.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.91%	10.81%	+4.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.13%	13.84%	+5.29%

REVS vs. ABEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

REVS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ABEQ's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

REVS vs. ABEQ - Dividend Comparison

REVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than ABEQ's 1.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF	1.21%	1.25%	1.48%	2.60%	1.20%	0.60%	0.60%	0.00%
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF	1.91%	2.13%	1.89%	2.49%	2.46%	1.18%	27.75%	0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REVS and ABEQ in my portfolio?

REVS and ABEQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REVS or ABEQ?

REVS has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to ABEQ (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REVS dropped -37.85% vs ABEQ's -27.82%.

Which ETF is better, REVS or ABEQ?

On 5-year performance, REVS leads with 11.10% vs 7.06% for ABEQ. On fees, REVS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ABEQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, REVS or ABEQ?

Over the 5-year period, REVS has performed better with a 11.10% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, REVS or ABEQ?

REVS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ABEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REVS or ABEQ?

REVS has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.21% for ABEQ.

What is the main difference between REVS and ABEQ?

They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Absolute Investment Advisers LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for REVS and 0.85% for ABEQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

REVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.