PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RETL vs. YINN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RETL vs. YINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RETL achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly higher than YINN's -29.95% return. Over the past 10 years, RETL has outperformed YINN with an annualized return of -3.60%, while YINN has yielded a comparatively lower -18.37% annualized return.


RETL

1D
0.11%
1M
30.06%
YTD
-0.70%
6M
-9.36%
1Y
19.94%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
-27.38%
10Y*
-3.60%

YINN

1D
3.08%
1M
-23.37%
YTD
-29.95%
6M
-32.53%
1Y
-27.68%
3Y*
-6.43%
5Y*
-38.50%
10Y*
-18.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RETL vs. YINN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
-0.70%-5.98%9.59%33.62%-80.80%101.03%63.63%23.41%-35.21%-1.31%
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
-29.95%54.21%36.06%-53.08%-71.97%-58.56%-7.75%28.92%-48.47%129.79%

Correlation

The correlation between RETL and YINN is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2010

0.41

The correlation between RETL and YINN shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RETL vs. YINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RETL
YINN

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
27.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
0.9%

Communication Services

0.3%
15.7%

Technology

0.3%
5.5%

Healthcare

0.3%
2.3%

Energy

0.3%
5.6%

Basic Materials

-

4.2%

Financial Services

-

34.7%

Industrials

-

2.4%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

RETL
14.0%
YINN
27.4%

Consumer Defensive

RETL
3.9%
YINN
0.9%

Communication Services

RETL
0.3%
YINN
15.7%

Technology

RETL
0.3%
YINN
5.5%

Healthcare

RETL
0.3%
YINN
2.3%

Energy

RETL
0.3%
YINN
5.6%

Basic Materials

RETL

-

YINN
4.2%

Financial Services

RETL

-

YINN
34.7%

Industrials

RETL

-

YINN
2.4%

Real Estate

RETL

-

YINN
1.0%

Utilities

RETL

-

YINN
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RETL vs. YINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RETL
RETL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
RETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
RETL Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
RETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
RETL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

YINN
YINN Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RETL vs. YINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RETLYINNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.96

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

-0.56

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

-1.09

+2.16

RETL vs. YINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RETL Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the YINN Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RETL and YINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RETL vs. YINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RETL drawdown since its inception was -92.00%, smaller than the maximum YINN drawdown of -98.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RETL and YINN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RETLYINNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.00%

-98.87%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.08%

-49.61%

+11.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.72%

-69.08%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.00%

-96.28%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.00%

-98.59%

+6.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.95%

-97.52%

+14.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.62%

-68.51%

+30.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.57%

25.53%

-6.96%

Volatility

RETL vs. YINN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) is 16.60%, while Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a volatility of 18.63%. This indicates that RETL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RETLYINNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.60%

18.63%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.99%

42.54%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.71%

58.74%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.51%

94.19%

-14.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.80%

81.73%

-1.93%

RETL vs. YINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

RETL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than YINN's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

RETL vs. YINN - Dividend Comparison

RETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than YINN's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
0.51%0.58%1.13%1.35%0.71%0.22%0.19%0.92%1.19%0.01%2.60%
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
1.42%1.12%1.81%4.17%1.16%0.73%0.76%1.38%1.02%1.11%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RETL and YINN have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YINN has higher volatility (18.63%) compared to RETL (16.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RETL dropped -92.00% vs YINN's -98.87%.

On 10-year performance, RETL leads with -3.60% vs -18.37% for YINN. On fees, RETL is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, RETL has been the lower-risk option at 16.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RETL has performed better with a -3.60% return vs -18.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RETL is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.

YINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.51% for RETL.

RETL tracks Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%), while YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RETL and 1.52% for YINN.

RETL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RETL and YINN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer