PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RETL vs. XRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RETL vs. XRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RETL achieves a -13.97% return, which is significantly lower than XRT's -1.99% return. Over the past 10 years, RETL has underperformed XRT with an annualized return of -5.65%, while XRT has yielded a comparatively higher 8.56% annualized return.


RETL

1D
-1.25%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
-13.97%
6M
-14.71%
1Y
2.31%
3Y*
12.49%
5Y*
-28.39%
10Y*
-5.65%

XRT

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
-1.99%
6M
-2.00%
1Y
8.44%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
-0.84%
10Y*
8.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RETL vs. XRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
-13.97%-5.98%9.59%33.62%-80.80%101.03%63.63%23.41%-35.21%-1.31%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
-1.99%8.07%11.78%21.53%-31.64%42.60%41.91%14.12%-8.04%4.22%

Correlation

The correlation between RETL and XRT is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2010

0.92

The correlation between RETL and XRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

RETL vs. XRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RETL
XRT

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
73.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
20.9%

Communication Services

0.3%
1.4%

Technology

0.3%
1.4%

Healthcare

0.3%
1.4%

Energy

0.3%
1.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

RETL
14.0%
XRT
73.6%

Consumer Defensive

RETL
3.9%
XRT
20.9%

Communication Services

RETL
0.3%
XRT
1.4%

Technology

RETL
0.3%
XRT
1.4%

Healthcare

RETL
0.3%
XRT
1.4%

Energy

RETL
0.3%
XRT
1.4%

Basic Materials

RETL

-

XRT

-

Financial Services

RETL

-

XRT

-

Industrials

RETL

-

XRT

-

Real Estate

RETL

-

XRT

-

Utilities

RETL

-

XRT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RETL vs. XRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RETL
RETL Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
RETL Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
RETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
RETL Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

XRT
XRT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RETL vs. XRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RETLXRTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.04

0.42

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.50

0.76

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.08

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

0.63

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.13

1.45

-1.32

RETL vs. XRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RETL Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the XRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RETL and XRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RETLXRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

0.42

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

-0.03

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

0.32

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.35

-0.15

Drawdowns

RETL vs. XRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RETL drawdown since its inception was -92.00%, which is greater than XRT's maximum drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RETL and XRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RETLXRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.00%

-65.81%

-26.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.08%

-13.53%

-24.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.72%

-25.62%

-37.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.00%

-44.57%

-47.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.00%

-47.02%

-44.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.23%

-13.82%

-71.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.55%

-15.00%

-22.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.20%

5.85%

+12.35%

Volatility

RETL vs. XRT - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) has a higher volatility of 18.99% compared to SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) at 6.50%. This indicates that RETL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RETLXRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.99%

6.50%

+12.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.17%

13.63%

+26.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.15%

20.42%

+39.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.48%

26.90%

+52.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.75%

27.16%

+52.59%

RETL vs. XRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RETL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XRT's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RETL vs. XRT - Dividend Comparison

RETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than XRT's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
0.59%0.58%1.13%1.35%0.71%0.22%0.19%0.92%1.19%0.01%2.60%0.00%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
0.83%0.77%1.52%1.40%2.15%1.55%1.01%1.57%1.51%1.52%1.36%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, RETL and XRT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RETL has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to XRT (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RETL dropped -92.00% vs XRT's -65.81%.

On 10-year performance, XRT leads with 8.56% vs -5.65% for RETL. On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XRT has been the lower-risk option at 6.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XRT has performed better with a 8.56% return vs -5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RETL.

XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.59% for RETL.

RETL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XRT is Consumer Discretionary Equities. RETL tracks Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%), while XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RETL and 0.35% for XRT.

XRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RETL and XRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer