PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RETL vs. UMDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RETL vs. UMDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RETL achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than UMDD's 38.51% return. Over the past 10 years, RETL has underperformed UMDD with an annualized return of -5.07%, while UMDD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.03% annualized return.


RETL

1D
-1.39%
1M
6.66%
6M
-9.95%
YTD
0.69%
1Y
8.84%
3Y*
7.18%
5Y*
-26.39%
10Y*
-5.07%
ALL TIME*
14.64%

UMDD

1D
3.00%
1M
-1.43%
6M
22.31%
YTD
38.51%
1Y
50.43%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
11.03%
ALL TIME*
19.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RETL vs. UMDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
0.69%-5.98%9.59%33.62%-80.80%101.03%63.63%23.41%-35.21%-1.31%
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
38.51%-2.57%19.68%27.21%-49.60%72.27%-17.30%78.90%-40.29%49.17%

Correlation

The correlation between RETL and UMDD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2010

0.74

The correlation between RETL and UMDD shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RETL vs. UMDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RETL
UMDD

Consumer Cyclical

75.2%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

18.7%
3.2%

Technology

2.7%
17.2%

Communication Services

1.8%
1.5%

Healthcare

1.6%
9.0%

Energy

0.3%
4.6%

Basic Materials

-

4.8%

Financial Services

-

13.9%

Industrials

-

25.3%

Real Estate

-

7.2%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

RETL
75.2%
UMDD
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

RETL
18.7%
UMDD
3.2%

Technology

RETL
2.7%
UMDD
17.2%

Communication Services

RETL
1.8%
UMDD
1.5%

Healthcare

RETL
1.6%
UMDD
9.0%

Energy

RETL
0.3%
UMDD
4.6%

Basic Materials

RETL

-

UMDD
4.8%

Financial Services

RETL

-

UMDD
13.9%

Industrials

RETL

-

UMDD
25.3%

Real Estate

RETL

-

UMDD
7.2%

Utilities

RETL

-

UMDD
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RETL vs. UMDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RETL
RETL Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
RETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
RETL Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
RETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
RETL Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

UMDD
UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RETL vs. UMDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RETLUMDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.20

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

1.95

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.46

6.43

-5.97

RETL vs. UMDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RETL Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the UMDD Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RETL and UMDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RETL vs. UMDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RETL drawdown since its inception was -92.00%, which is greater than UMDD's maximum drawdown of -86.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RETL and UMDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RETLUMDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.00%

-86.24%

-5.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.08%

-26.04%

-12.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.72%

-60.33%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.00%

-64.61%

-27.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.00%

-86.24%

-5.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.71%

-5.90%

-76.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.90%

-23.46%

-14.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.41%

7.87%

+11.54%

Volatility

RETL vs. UMDD - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) has a higher volatility of 14.91% compared to ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) at 10.22%. This indicates that RETL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RETLUMDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.91%

10.22%

+4.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.05%

35.30%

+7.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.10%

47.25%

+13.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.29%

58.69%

+20.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.96%

62.10%

+17.86%

RETL vs. UMDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RETL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than UMDD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

RETL vs. UMDD - Dividend Comparison

RETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than UMDD's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
0.50%0.58%1.13%1.35%0.71%0.22%0.19%0.92%1.19%0.01%2.60%0.00%
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
0.67%1.00%0.76%0.19%0.49%0.06%0.08%0.64%0.32%0.00%0.03%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


RETL and UMDD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RETL has higher volatility (14.91%) compared to UMDD (10.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RETL dropped -92.00% vs UMDD's -86.24%.

On 10-year performance, UMDD leads with 11.03% vs -5.07% for RETL. On fees, UMDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UMDD has been the lower-risk option at 10.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UMDD has performed better with a 11.03% return vs -5.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UMDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RETL.

UMDD has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.50% for RETL.

RETL tracks Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%), while UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RETL and 0.95% for UMDD.

UMDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RETL and UMDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer