PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RETL vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RETL vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RETL achieves a -7.34% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 56.90% return. Over the past 10 years, RETL has underperformed TNA with an annualized return of -4.29%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively higher 9.70% annualized return.


RETL

1D
0.59%
1M
10.51%
YTD
-7.34%
6M
-11.19%
1Y
11.63%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
-28.61%
10Y*
-4.29%

TNA

1D
-3.11%
1M
9.59%
YTD
56.90%
6M
45.88%
1Y
125.39%
3Y*
32.32%
5Y*
-5.98%
10Y*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RETL vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
-7.34%-5.98%9.59%33.62%-80.80%101.03%63.63%23.41%-35.21%-1.31%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
56.90%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between RETL and TNA is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2010

0.74

The correlation between RETL and TNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RETL vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RETL
TNA

Consumer Cyclical

17.0%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
2.3%

Energy

0.3%
5.4%

Technology

0.3%
19.1%

Healthcare

0.3%
16.3%

Communication Services

0.3%
2.4%

Basic Materials

-

4.7%

Financial Services

-

15.3%

Industrials

-

18.0%

Real Estate

-

5.9%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

RETL
17.0%
TNA
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

RETL
4.6%
TNA
2.3%

Energy

RETL
0.3%
TNA
5.4%

Technology

RETL
0.3%
TNA
19.1%

Healthcare

RETL
0.3%
TNA
16.3%

Communication Services

RETL
0.3%
TNA
2.4%

Basic Materials

RETL

-

TNA
4.7%

Financial Services

RETL

-

TNA
15.3%

Industrials

RETL

-

TNA
18.0%

Real Estate

RETL

-

TNA
5.9%

Utilities

RETL

-

TNA
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RETL vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RETL
RETL Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
RETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
RETL Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
RETL Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RETL vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RETLTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.31

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.31

3.88

-3.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

12.72

-12.10

RETL vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RETL Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RETL and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RETL vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RETL drawdown since its inception was -92.00%, roughly equal to the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RETL and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RETLTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.00%

-88.09%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.08%

-32.53%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.72%

-65.78%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.00%

-82.36%

-9.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.00%

-88.09%

-3.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.09%

-33.64%

-50.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.69%

-33.92%

-3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.86%

9.89%

+8.97%

Volatility

RETL vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) is 18.79%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 19.82%. This indicates that RETL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RETLTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.79%

19.82%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.33%

42.69%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.75%

58.76%

+1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.55%

67.57%

+11.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.91%

68.50%

+11.41%

RETL vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RETL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RETL vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

RETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, more than TNA's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
0.55%0.58%1.13%1.35%0.71%0.22%0.19%0.92%1.19%0.01%2.60%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.38%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RETL and TNA have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNA has higher volatility (19.82%) compared to RETL (18.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RETL dropped -92.00% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 10-year performance, TNA leads with 9.70% vs -4.29% for RETL. On fees, RETL is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, RETL has been the lower-risk option at 18.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TNA has performed better with a 9.70% return vs -4.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RETL is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

RETL has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.38% for TNA.

RETL tracks Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RETL and 1.05% for TNA.

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RETL and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer