RETL vs. NRGU
RETL (Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - RETL tracks the Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%) while NRGU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RETL returned 8.48% vs 164.28% for NRGU. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RETL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.
Performance
RETL vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RETL achieves a -12.88% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 123.66% return.
RETL
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -8.46%
- YTD
- -12.88%
- 6M
- -10.06%
- 1Y
- 8.48%
- 3Y*
- 12.96%
- 5Y*
- -28.26%
- 10Y*
- -5.53%
NRGU
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 123.66%
- 6M
- 98.58%
- 1Y
- 164.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RETL vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RETL Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares | -12.88% | 3.44% |
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 123.66% | -33.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between RETL and NRGU is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | 0.18 |
The correlation between RETL and NRGU shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RETL vs. NRGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RETL
NRGU
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
RETL
NRGU
-
Consumer Defensive
RETL
NRGU
-
Communication Services
RETL
NRGU
-
Technology
RETL
NRGU
-
Healthcare
RETL
NRGU
-
Energy
RETL
NRGU
Basic Materials
RETL
-
NRGU
-
Financial Services
RETL
-
NRGU
-
Industrials
RETL
-
NRGU
-
Real Estate
RETL
-
NRGU
-
Utilities
RETL
-
NRGU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RETL vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank
RETL
NRGU
RETL vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RETL | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | 2.20 | -2.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.65 | 2.49 | -1.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.31 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 4.31 | -4.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.55 | 10.83 | -10.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RETL | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 2.20 | -2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.42 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
RETL vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RETL drawdown since its inception was -92.00%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RETL and NRGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RETL | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.00% | -57.50% | -34.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.08% | -39.95% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.04% | -22.86% | -62.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.54% | -25.43% | -12.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.11% | 15.91% | +2.20% |
Volatility
RETL vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) is 20.25%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 32.14%. This indicates that RETL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RETL | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.25% | 32.14% | -11.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.17% | 61.37% | -21.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.15% | 75.17% | -15.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.51% | 89.27% | -9.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.76% | 89.27% | -9.51% |
RETL vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
RETL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
RETL vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison
RETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RETL Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares | 0.59% | 0.58% | 1.13% | 1.35% | 0.71% | 0.22% | 0.19% | 0.92% | 1.19% | 0.01% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RETL and NRGU have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRGU has higher volatility (32.14%) compared to RETL (20.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RETL dropped -92.00% vs NRGU's -57.50%.
On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 164.28% vs 8.48% for RETL. On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, RETL has been the lower-risk option at 20.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 164.28% return vs 8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RETL.
RETL has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.
RETL tracks Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%), while NRGU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RETL and 0.95% for NRGU.
NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RETL and NRGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer