RETL vs. GDXU
RETL (Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares) and GDXU (MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - RETL tracks the Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%) while GDXU tracks the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RETL returned -28.39%/yr vs -10.91%/yr for GDXU. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RETL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GDXU.
Performance
RETL vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RETL achieves a -13.97% return, which is significantly higher than GDXU's -43.81% return.
RETL
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- -13.97%
- 6M
- -14.71%
- 1Y
- 2.31%
- 3Y*
- 12.49%
- 5Y*
- -28.39%
- 10Y*
- -5.65%
GDXU
- 1D
- -10.63%
- 1M
- -11.26%
- YTD
- -43.81%
- 6M
- -33.96%
- 1Y
- 72.31%
- 3Y*
- 46.61%
- 5Y*
- -10.91%
- 10Y*
- —
RETL vs. GDXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RETL Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares | -13.97% | -5.98% | 9.59% | 33.62% | -80.80% | 101.03% | 15.31% |
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN | -43.81% | 796.47% | -18.60% | -21.36% | -62.82% | -54.93% | 4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between RETL and GDXU is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020 | 0.21 |
RETL vs. GDXU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RETL
GDXU
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
RETL
GDXU
-
Consumer Defensive
RETL
GDXU
-
Communication Services
RETL
GDXU
-
Technology
RETL
GDXU
-
Healthcare
RETL
GDXU
-
Energy
RETL
GDXU
-
Basic Materials
RETL
-
GDXU
Financial Services
RETL
-
GDXU
-
Industrials
RETL
-
GDXU
-
Real Estate
RETL
-
GDXU
-
Utilities
RETL
-
GDXU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RETL vs. GDXU — Risk / Return Rank
RETL
GDXU
RETL vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RETL | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.04 | 0.53 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 1.53 | -1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.21 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.06 | 0.98 | -0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.13 | 2.00 | -1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RETL | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 | 0.53 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | -0.10 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | -0.09 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
RETL vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RETL drawdown since its inception was -92.00%, roughly equal to the maximum GDXU drawdown of -94.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RETL and GDXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RETL | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.00% | -94.39% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.08% | -73.99% | +35.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.72% | -73.99% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.00% | -92.93% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.23% | -73.92% | -11.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.55% | -69.77% | +32.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.20% | 36.23% | -18.03% |
Volatility
RETL vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) is 18.99%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) has a volatility of 46.45%. This indicates that RETL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RETL | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.99% | 46.45% | -27.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.17% | 118.07% | -77.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.15% | 137.57% | -77.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.48% | 110.85% | -31.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.75% | 110.02% | -30.27% |
RETL vs. GDXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
RETL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
RETL vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison
RETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RETL Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares | 0.59% | 0.58% | 1.13% | 1.35% | 0.71% | 0.22% | 0.19% | 0.92% | 1.19% | 0.01% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RETL and GDXU have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXU has higher volatility (46.45%) compared to RETL (18.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RETL dropped -92.00% vs GDXU's -94.39%.
On 5-year performance, GDXU leads with -10.91% vs -28.39% for RETL. On fees, GDXU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, RETL has been the lower-risk option at 18.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GDXU has performed better with a -10.91% return vs -28.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDXU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RETL.
RETL has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.00% for GDXU.
RETL tracks Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%), while GDXU tracks S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RETL and 0.95% for GDXU.
GDXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RETL and GDXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer