RESM vs. INEQ
RESM (Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF) and INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RESM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced Small Cap Index, while INEQ is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Columbia Threadneedle. RESM is passively managed, while INEQ is actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RESM charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for INEQ.
Performance
RESM vs. INEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RESM achieves a 21.67% return, which is significantly higher than INEQ's 6.93% return.
RESM
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- YTD
- 21.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INEQ
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 6.86%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 21.47%
- 3Y*
- 18.85%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.78%
RESM vs. INEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RESM Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 21.67% | -3.32% |
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 6.93% | 2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between RESM and INEQ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RESM vs. INEQ — Risk / Return Rank
RESM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INEQ
RESM vs. INEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) and Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RESM | INEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.21 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RESM vs. INEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RESM drawdown since its inception was -8.50%, smaller than the maximum INEQ drawdown of -41.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RESM and INEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RESM | INEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | -41.71% | +33.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -3.85% | +2.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.77% | -7.04% | +5.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.92% | — |
Volatility
RESM vs. INEQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RESM | INEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.36% | 13.72% | +3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 15.34% | +2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 16.34% | +1.02% |
RESM vs. INEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RESM has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than INEQ's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
RESM vs. INEQ - Dividend Comparison
RESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than INEQ's 9.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 9.76% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% |
RESM Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RESM and INEQ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RESM is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RESM is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for INEQ.
INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.76%, compared with 0.08% for RESM.
RESM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while INEQ is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for RESM and 0.45% for INEQ.
Find the right allocation for RESM and INEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer