REPL vs. DNN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Replimune Group, Inc. (REPL) and Denison Mines Corp (DNN).

Performance

REPL vs. DNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Replimune Group, Inc. (REPL) and Denison Mines Corp (DNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

REPL vs. DNN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
REPL Replimune Group, Inc.	-21.30%	-19.74%	43.65%	-69.01%	0.37%	-28.96%	165.85%	43.50%	-34.04%
DNN Denison Mines Corp	32.71%	47.78%	1.69%	53.91%	-16.06%	111.75%	54.05%	-9.48%	-3.33%

Fundamentals

Market Cap REPL : $705.23M DNN : $3.18B
EPS REPL : -$3.43 DNN : -$0.24
PB Ratio REPL : 3.35 DNN : 8.65
Total Revenue (TTM) REPL : $0.00 DNN : $4.92M
Gross Profit (TTM) REPL : -$2.49M DNN : -$23.92M
EBITDA (TTM) REPL : -$315.29M DNN : -$171.24M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REPL achieves a -21.30% return, which is significantly lower than DNN's 32.71% return.

REPL

• 1D: 6.25%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -21.30%
• 6M: 82.58%
• 1Y: -21.54%
• 3Y*: -24.34%
• 5Y*: -24.69%
• 10Y*: —

DNN

• 1D: 6.97%
• 1M: -15.55%
• YTD: 32.71%
• 6M: 28.36%
• 1Y: 171.54%
• 3Y*: 47.95%
• 5Y*: 24.50%
• 10Y*: 20.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

REPL vs. DNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REPL

REPL Risk / Return Rank: 49
REPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
REPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
REPL Omega Ratio Rank: 80
REPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
REPL Martin Ratio Rank: 30

DNN

DNN Risk / Return Rank: 93
DNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
DNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DNN Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
DNN Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REPL vs. DNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Replimune Group, Inc. (REPL) and Denison Mines Corp (DNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REPL	DNN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	2.72	-2.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	3.11	-1.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.37	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	5.61	-5.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.68	15.68	-16.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REPL vs. DNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REPL Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the DNN Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REPL and DNN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REPL	DNN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11	2.72	-2.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.24	0.38	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	-0.07	-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between REPL and DNN is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

REPL vs. DNN - Dividend Comparison

Neither REPL nor DNN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

REPL vs. DNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REPL drawdown since its inception was -94.67%, roughly equal to the maximum DNN drawdown of -98.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REPL and DNN.

Drawdown Indicators

	REPL	DNN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.67%	-98.96%	+4.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.79%	-29.50%	-48.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.91%	-55.66%	-37.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.47%	-81.69%	-3.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.70%	-85.10%	+30.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.72%	10.55%	+28.17%

Volatility

REPL vs. DNN - Volatility Comparison

Replimune Group, Inc. (REPL) has a higher volatility of 23.03% compared to Denison Mines Corp (DNN) at 20.08%. This indicates that REPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REPL	DNN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.03%	20.08%	+2.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	83.81%	45.53%	+38.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	188.85%	63.51%	+125.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	104.61%	64.41%	+40.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	98.38%	64.17%	+34.21%

Financials