REMX vs. FLTR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR).

REMX and FLTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. REMX is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. It was launched on Oct 27, 2010. FLTR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. It was launched on Apr 25, 2011. Both REMX and FLTR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

REMX vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

REMX vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF	19.05%	92.95%	-35.02%	-19.18%	-31.13%	79.81%	64.82%	0.74%	-49.63%	82.60%
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	0.71%	5.22%	7.38%	7.41%	0.74%	0.55%	1.44%	5.70%	0.30%	2.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMX achieves a 19.05% return, which is significantly higher than FLTR's 0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, REMX has outperformed FLTR with an annualized return of 10.24%, while FLTR has yielded a comparatively lower 3.46% annualized return.

REMX

• 1D: 2.95%
• 1M: -11.88%
• YTD: 19.05%
• 6M: 36.14%
• 1Y: 126.68%
• 3Y*: 4.04%
• 5Y*: 5.20%
• 10Y*: 10.24%

FLTR

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 4.72%
• 3Y*: 6.48%
• 5Y*: 4.28%
• 10Y*: 3.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMX vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.

REMX

VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF

FLTR

VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF

Return for Risk

REMX vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMX

REMX Risk / Return Rank: 95
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

FLTR

FLTR Risk / Return Rank: 92
FLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
FLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMX vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REMX	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	2.10	+0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	2.43	+0.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.93	-0.54
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.10	2.47	+2.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.16	18.16	-3.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REMX vs. FLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the FLTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMX and FLTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REMX	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65	2.10	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	2.01	-1.88
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	0.69	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.51	-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between REMX and FLTR is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

REMX vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than FLTR's 4.89% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF	1.48%	1.76%	2.56%	0.00%	1.56%	5.25%	0.81%	1.64%	12.43%	2.89%	2.23%	4.77%
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	4.89%	4.97%	5.93%	6.07%	2.29%	0.63%	1.49%	3.05%	2.67%	1.69%	1.16%	0.71%

Drawdowns

REMX vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and FLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	REMX	FLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.20%	-17.84%	-72.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.35%	-1.93%	-21.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.34%	-3.06%	-70.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.34%	-17.84%	-55.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.70%	-0.12%	-59.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.01%	-0.68%	-66.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.86%	0.26%	+7.60%

Volatility

REMX vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a higher volatility of 17.39% compared to VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.40%. This indicates that REMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REMX	FLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.39%	0.40%	+16.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.90%	0.57%	+37.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.30%	2.25%	+46.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.76%	2.14%	+37.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.61%	5.01%	+31.60%