REMC vs. CSD
REMC (Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) and CSD (Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - REMC tracks the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced Mid Cap Index while CSD tracks the S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. REMC charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CSD.
Performance
REMC vs. CSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REMC achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly lower than CSD's 42.39% return.
REMC
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- YTD
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSD
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 38.86%
- YTD
- 42.39%
- 1Y
- 66.72%
- 3Y*
- 35.99%
- 5Y*
- 17.53%
- 10Y*
- 14.50%
REMC vs. CSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
REMC Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 11.94% | -1.99% |
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF | 42.39% | -3.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between REMC and CSD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REMC vs. CSD — Risk / Return Rank
REMC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CSD
REMC vs. CSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (REMC) and Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REMC | CSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 23.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REMC vs. CSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REMC drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, smaller than the maximum CSD drawdown of -70.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMC and CSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REMC | CSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -70.47% | +63.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -5.17% | +5.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.46% | -14.18% | +12.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.93% | — |
Volatility
REMC vs. CSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REMC | CSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.25% | 25.44% | -13.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.25% | 23.59% | -11.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.25% | 24.93% | -12.68% |
REMC vs. CSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
REMC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than CSD's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
REMC vs. CSD - Dividend Comparison
REMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than CSD's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.51% | 0.86% | 0.73% | 0.99% | 1.08% | 0.99% | 0.60% | 1.62% | 2.61% |
REMC Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REMC and CSD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REMC is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REMC is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSD.
CSD has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.07% for REMC.
REMC tracks Beta Advantage Research Enhanced Mid Cap Index, while CSD tracks S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index. They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for REMC and 0.65% for CSD.
Find the right allocation for REMC and CSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer