REK vs. QLD
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD).
REK and QLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. REK is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the DJ Global United States (All) / Real Estate -SS (-100%). It was launched on Mar 18, 2010. QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. Both REK and QLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
REK vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
REK vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REK ProShares Short Real Estate | -0.82% | 2.35% | 1.42% | -6.61% | 29.17% | -30.58% | -11.33% | -20.96% | 4.61% | -9.34% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | -13.35% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REK achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's -13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, REK has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of -5.81%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 29.40% annualized return.
REK
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 6.98%
- YTD
- -0.82%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- -0.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.96%
- 10Y*
- -5.81%
QLD
- 1D
- 6.72%
- 1M
- -10.26%
- YTD
- -13.35%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- 1Y
- 37.53%
- 3Y*
- 35.41%
- 5Y*
- 15.27%
- 10Y*
- 29.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
REK vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both REK and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
REK vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
REK
QLD
REK vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REK | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.22 | 0.84 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.45 | 1.43 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.20 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 1.49 | -1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.28 | 4.88 | -4.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REK | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 0.84 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.34 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.29 | 0.66 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | 0.53 | -1.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between REK and QLD is -0.49. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
REK vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
REK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than QLD's 0.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REK ProShares Short Real Estate | 3.08% | 3.43% | 6.22% | 4.50% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 1.28% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
REK vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REK drawdown since its inception was -84.57%, roughly equal to the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REK and QLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| REK | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.57% | -83.13% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.26% | -25.13% | +10.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.93% | -63.68% | +36.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.67% | -63.68% | +5.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.84% | -20.10% | -60.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.88% | -18.30% | -45.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.93% | 7.67% | +2.26% |
Volatility
REK vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) is 4.53%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 12.96%. This indicates that REK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| REK | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 12.96% | -8.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 25.55% | -16.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.42% | 44.91% | -28.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 44.77% | -25.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 44.47% | -24.19% |