REIT vs. RDOG
REIT (ALPS Active REIT ETF) and RDOG (ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF) are both REIT funds. REIT is actively managed, while RDOG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, REIT returned 4.38%/yr vs 2.37%/yr for RDOG. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REIT charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RDOG.
Performance
REIT vs. RDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REIT achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly lower than RDOG's 14.68% return.
REIT
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 12.18%
- 1Y
- 13.01%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.38%
- 10Y*
- —
RDOG
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 14.68%
- 6M
- 15.68%
- 1Y
- 21.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.70%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
REIT vs. RDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF | 12.74% | -0.55% | 7.11% | 13.74% | -21.23% | 33.56% |
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 14.68% | 0.95% | 4.57% | 10.38% | -25.53% | 28.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between REIT and RDOG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2021 | 0.87 |
The correlation between REIT and RDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
REIT vs. RDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REIT
RDOG
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
REIT
RDOG
Basic Materials
REIT
-
RDOG
-
Communication Services
REIT
-
RDOG
-
Consumer Cyclical
REIT
-
RDOG
-
Consumer Defensive
REIT
-
RDOG
-
Energy
REIT
-
RDOG
-
Financial Services
REIT
-
RDOG
-
Healthcare
REIT
-
RDOG
-
Industrials
REIT
-
RDOG
-
Technology
REIT
-
RDOG
-
Utilities
REIT
-
RDOG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REIT vs. RDOG — Risk / Return Rank
REIT
RDOG
REIT vs. RDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REIT | RDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 1.49 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 2.16 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.25 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 2.14 | -0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.26 | 6.95 | -1.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REIT | RDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.49 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.12 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.17 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
REIT vs. RDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REIT drawdown since its inception was -29.30%, smaller than the maximum RDOG drawdown of -67.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REIT and RDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REIT | RDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.30% | -67.59% | +38.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.35% | -10.02% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.19% | -21.40% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.30% | -35.52% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -1.24% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.39% | -12.26% | +1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 3.09% | -0.56% |
Volatility
REIT vs. RDOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) is 3.88%, while ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that REIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REIT | RDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 4.15% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 10.43% | -1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 14.49% | -1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 19.84% | -1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 23.05% | -4.67% |
REIT vs. RDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
REIT has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than RDOG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
REIT vs. RDOG - Dividend Comparison
REIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than RDOG's 6.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 6.08% | 6.91% | 6.11% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 3.11% | 5.12% | 3.10% | 3.13% | 3.64% | 3.66% | 3.43% |
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF | 2.80% | 3.20% | 3.06% | 3.13% | 2.81% | 4.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REIT and RDOG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDOG has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to REIT (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REIT dropped -29.30% vs RDOG's -67.59%.
On 5-year performance, REIT leads with 4.38% vs 2.37% for RDOG. On fees, RDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, REIT has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, REIT has performed better with a 4.38% return vs 2.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for REIT.
RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 2.80% for REIT.
They also come from different issuers: ALPS and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for REIT and 0.35% for RDOG.
RDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REIT and RDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer