PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REGS vs. AAAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REGS vs. AAAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


REGS

1D
-1.06%
1M
-4.44%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AAAC

1D
0.02%
1M
0.38%
6M
2.40%
YTD
2.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REGS vs. AAAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between REGS and AAAC is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REGS vs. AAAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

REGS vs. AAAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REGS vs. AAAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGS drawdown since its inception was -7.59%, which is greater than AAAC's maximum drawdown of -0.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGS and AAAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REGSAAACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.59%

-0.55%

-7.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.84%

-0.02%

-5.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.22%

-0.04%

-2.18%

Volatility

REGS vs. AAAC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REGSAAACDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.25%

0.86%

+19.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.25%

0.86%

+19.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.25%

0.86%

+19.39%

REGS vs. AAAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAC's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

REGS vs. AAAC - Dividend Comparison

REGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%.


PositionTTM2025
AAAC
Columbia AAA CLO ETF
2.66%0.03%
REGS
Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


REGS and AAAC have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AAAC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAAC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for REGS.

AAAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.00% for REGS.

REGS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AAAC is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for REGS and 0.20% for AAAC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REGS and AAAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer