REGL vs. WTV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and WTV (WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. REGL is passively managed, while WTV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, REGL returned 7.41%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for WTV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REGL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for WTV.

Performance

REGL vs. WTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly lower than WTV's 10.06% return.

REGL

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 1.92%
• YTD: 8.22%
• 6M: 6.56%
• 1Y: 13.68%
• 3Y*: 12.57%
• 5Y*: 7.41%
• 10Y*: 9.68%

WTV

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 6M: 9.41%
• 1Y: 22.34%
• 3Y*: 21.29%
• 5Y*: 13.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REGL vs. WTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	8.22%	6.89%	12.26%	5.41%	-0.62%	20.38%	7.50%	18.79%	-3.25%	1.08%
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	10.06%	13.51%	23.99%	22.35%	-8.06%	30.59%	6.15%	29.69%	-8.29%	1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between REGL and WTV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017	0.85

The correlation between REGL and WTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

REGL vs. WTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	REGL	WTV
Financial Services	31.0%	18.5%
Industrials	15.2%	10.3%
Utilities	13.7%	4.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	10.6%
Basic Materials	9.2%	2.2%
Real Estate	7.8%	5.4%
Healthcare	4.6%	7.5%
Energy	3.1%	6.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	9.9%
Technology	1.9%	18.3%
Communication Services	-	6.5%

Return for Risk

REGL vs. WTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REGL

REGL Risk / Return Rank: 30
REGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
REGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
REGL Omega Ratio Rank: 28
REGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
REGL Martin Ratio Rank: 32

WTV

WTV Risk / Return Rank: 61
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 57
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REGL vs. WTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	REGL	WTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	1.89	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	2.75	-1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.34	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	3.14	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.41	10.16	-5.75

REGL vs. WTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the WTV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REGL and WTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

REGL vs. WTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, smaller than the maximum WTV drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and WTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	REGL	WTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.37%	-42.18%	+5.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-7.15%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.96%	-18.49%	+1.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.96%	-19.30%	+2.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.97%	-1.54%	-0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-5.03%	+0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	2.20%	+0.91%

Volatility

REGL vs. WTV - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) have volatilities of 3.57% and 3.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REGL	WTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.57%	3.65%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.31%	8.20%	+1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.24%	11.90%	+1.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.06%	17.08%	-1.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.32%	20.16%	-1.84%

REGL vs. WTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than WTV's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

REGL vs. WTV - Dividend Comparison

REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than WTV's 1.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.15%	2.32%	2.28%	2.40%	2.32%	2.50%	2.41%	1.96%	2.09%	1.63%	1.20%	1.66%
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	1.66%	1.59%	1.54%	1.62%	2.08%	1.55%	1.63%	1.44%	1.94%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REGL and WTV in my portfolio?

REGL and WTV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REGL or WTV?

WTV has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to REGL (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGL dropped -36.37% vs WTV's -42.18%.

Which ETF is better, REGL or WTV?

On 5-year performance, WTV leads with 13.43% vs 7.41% for REGL. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, REGL or WTV?

Over the 5-year period, WTV has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 7.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, REGL or WTV?

WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for REGL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REGL or WTV?

REGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.66% for WTV.

What is the main difference between REGL and WTV?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.12% for WTV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.