REGL vs. SMIG
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG).
REGL and SMIG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. REGL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2015. SMIG is an actively managed fund by Bahl & Gaynor. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021.
Performance
REGL vs. SMIG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
REGL vs. SMIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.68% | 6.89% | 12.26% | 5.41% | -0.62% | 4.70% |
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 2.39% | 0.78% | 17.63% | 13.62% | -11.83% | 5.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 3.68% return, which is significantly higher than SMIG's 2.39% return.
REGL
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -5.49%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 6M
- 3.27%
- 1Y
- 9.65%
- 3Y*
- 9.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
SMIG
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- 10.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
REGL vs. SMIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SMIG's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
REGL vs. SMIG — Risk / Return Rank
REGL
SMIG
REGL vs. SMIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REGL | SMIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.60 | 0.30 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.97 | 0.54 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.07 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 0.44 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.24 | 1.44 | +1.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REGL | SMIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 0.30 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.34 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between REGL and SMIG is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
REGL vs. SMIG - Dividend Comparison
REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than SMIG's 1.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.24% | 2.32% | 2.28% | 2.40% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 1.96% | 2.09% | 1.63% | 1.20% | 1.66% |
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 1.85% | 1.82% | 1.75% | 1.91% | 2.00% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
REGL vs. SMIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, which is greater than SMIG's maximum drawdown of -19.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and SMIG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| REGL | SMIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.37% | -19.65% | -16.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.94% | -11.92% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -7.01% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -6.72% | +2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 3.67% | -0.54% |
Volatility
REGL vs. SMIG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) at 4.02%. This indicates that REGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| REGL | SMIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 4.02% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.20% | 8.36% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.26% | 15.98% | +0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 16.33% | -0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 16.33% | +1.98% |