REGL vs. OILK
REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REGL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, REGL returned 5.92%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REGL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
REGL vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
REGL
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 3.98%
- 6M
- 4.90%
- 1Y
- 9.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.12%
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
REGL vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.98% | 6.89% | 12.26% | 5.41% | -0.62% | 20.38% | 7.50% | 18.79% | -3.25% | 10.17% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between REGL and OILK is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016 | 0.15 |
The correlation between REGL and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
REGL vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REGL
OILK
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
-
Financial Services
REGL
OILK
-
Industrials
REGL
OILK
-
Utilities
REGL
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
REGL
OILK
Basic Materials
REGL
OILK
-
Real Estate
REGL
OILK
-
Healthcare
REGL
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
REGL
OILK
-
Energy
REGL
OILK
-
Technology
REGL
OILK
-
Communication Services
REGL
-
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REGL vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
REGL
OILK
REGL vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REGL | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.34 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 3.42 | -2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.07 | 6.91 | -3.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REGL | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 2.06 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.59 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.12 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
REGL vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REGL | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.37% | -83.76% | +47.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -17.35% | +7.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.96% | -23.42% | +6.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | -34.69% | +17.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.82% | -3.66% | -2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -32.61% | +28.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 8.56% | -5.54% |
Volatility
REGL vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) is 3.65%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that REGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REGL | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 10.44% | -6.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.23% | 23.26% | -14.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.22% | 28.75% | -15.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 30.12% | -14.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 35.97% | -17.64% |
REGL vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
REGL vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.24% | 2.32% | 2.28% | 2.40% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 1.96% | 2.09% | 1.63% | 1.20% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REGL and OILK have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to REGL (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGL dropped -36.37% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 5.92% for REGL. On fees, REGL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, REGL has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 5.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REGL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 2.24% for REGL.
REGL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REGL and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer