REGL vs. ABLS
REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and ABLS (Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REGL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while ABLS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, REGL returned 9.25% vs 0.04% for ABLS. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. REGL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ABLS.
Performance
REGL vs. ABLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly higher than ABLS's 2.75% return.
REGL
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 3.98%
- 6M
- 4.90%
- 1Y
- 9.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.12%
ABLS
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 0.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REGL vs. ABLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.98% | 4.41% |
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF | 2.75% | -8.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between REGL and ABLS is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.64 |
The correlation between REGL and ABLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REGL vs. ABLS — Risk / Return Rank
REGL
ABLS
REGL vs. ABLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REGL | ABLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.01 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 0.00 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.07 | 0.01 | +3.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REGL | ABLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 0.00 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | -0.23 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
REGL vs. ABLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, which is greater than ABLS's maximum drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and ABLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REGL | ABLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.37% | -19.28% | -17.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -16.19% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.82% | -6.21% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -8.45% | +4.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 5.82% | -2.80% |
Volatility
REGL vs. ABLS - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) have volatilities of 3.65% and 3.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REGL | ABLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 3.80% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.23% | 12.68% | -3.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.22% | 17.35% | -4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 21.25% | -5.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 21.25% | -2.92% |
REGL vs. ABLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ABLS's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
REGL vs. ABLS - Dividend Comparison
REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than ABLS's 13.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF | 13.68% | 14.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.24% | 2.32% | 2.28% | 2.40% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 1.96% | 2.09% | 1.63% | 1.20% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REGL and ABLS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABLS has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to REGL (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGL dropped -36.37% vs ABLS's -19.28%.
On 1-year performance, REGL leads with 9.25% vs 0.04% for ABLS. On fees, ABLS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, REGL has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, REGL has performed better with a 9.25% return vs 0.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ABLS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for REGL.
ABLS has the higher dividend yield at 13.68%, compared with 2.24% for REGL.
REGL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while ABLS is Small Cap Blend Equities. REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while ABLS tracks Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Abacus. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.39% for ABLS.
REGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REGL and ABLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer