ABLS vs. ABLG
ABLS (Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF) and ABLG (Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ABLS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index, while ABLG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Abacus. ABLS is passively managed, while ABLG is actively managed. Over the past year, ABLS returned 14.54% vs 7.33% for ABLG. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ABLS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for ABLG.
Performance
ABLS vs. ABLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABLS achieves a 13.73% return, which is significantly higher than ABLG's -2.27% return.
ABLS
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -3.94%
- 6M
- 16.41%
- YTD
- 13.73%
- 1Y
- 14.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.62%
ABLG
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -3.63%
- 6M
- -4.25%
- YTD
- -2.27%
- 1Y
- 7.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.67%
- 5Y*
- 0.36%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.69%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.59K | $35.24K | $47.06K | |
| $105.10K | $83.71K | $40.86K |
ABLS vs. ABLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF | 13.73% | -8.72% |
ABLG Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF | -2.27% | 4.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABLS and ABLG is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | 0.62 |
The correlation between ABLS and ABLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABLS vs. ABLG — Risk / Return Rank
ABLS
ABLG
ABLS vs. ABLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABLS | ABLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.07 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 0.47 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.11 | 1.53 | +0.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABLS vs. ABLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABLS drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, smaller than the maximum ABLG drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLS and ABLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABLS | ABLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.28% | -34.17% | +14.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.19% | -13.00% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.68% | -8.52% | +3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.79% | -9.13% | +1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.84% | 4.02% | +1.82% |
Volatility
ABLS vs. ABLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) is 5.51%, while Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that ABLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABLS | ABLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 6.51% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.54% | 17.29% | -3.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.35% | 19.63% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 17.50% | +3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 19.07% | +1.98% |
ABLS vs. ABLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABLS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ABLG's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABLS vs. ABLG - Dividend Comparison
ABLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.66%, more than ABLG's 2.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABLG Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF | 2.48% | 2.30% | 2.13% | 2.39% | 9.36% | 2.01% | 0.64% | 1.90% | 0.92% | 0.26% |
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF | 12.66% | 14.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABLS and ABLG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABLG has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to ABLS (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABLS dropped -19.28% vs ABLG's -34.17%.
On 1-year performance, ABLS leads with 14.54% vs 7.33% for ABLG. On fees, ABLS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ABLS has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ABLS has performed better with a 14.54% return vs 7.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ABLS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for ABLG.
ABLS has the higher dividend yield at 12.66%, compared with 2.48% for ABLG.
ABLS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ABLG is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ABLS and 0.54% for ABLG.
ABLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABLS and ABLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer