REFI vs. LADR

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

REFI (Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.) and LADR (Ladder Capital Corp) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Mortgage industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 3 years, REFI returned 3.02%/yr vs 7.11%/yr for LADR. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

REFI vs. LADR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) and Ladder Capital Corp (LADR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REFI achieves a -2.68% return, which is significantly higher than LADR's -4.97% return.

REFI

• 1D: 3.06%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: -2.68%
• 6M: -4.63%
• 1Y: -6.81%
• 3Y*: 3.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LADR

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 1.90%
• YTD: -4.97%
• 6M: -6.32%
• 1Y: 4.88%
• 3Y*: 7.11%
• 5Y*: 5.71%
• 10Y*: 6.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REFI vs. LADR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
REFI Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.	-2.68%	-8.70%	8.69%	23.70%	3.35%	1.52%
LADR Ladder Capital Corp	-4.97%	6.69%	5.53%	25.22%	-8.95%	2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between REFI and LADR is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021	0.41

The correlation between REFI and LADR shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap REFI : $245.99M LADR : $1.29B
EPS REFI : $226.63 LADR : $0.44
PE Ratio REFI : 0.05 LADR : 23.39
PEG Ratio REFI : 0.00 LADR : 1.11
PS Ratio REFI : 5.54 LADR : 3.21
PB Ratio REFI : 0.00 LADR : 0.89
Total Revenue (TTM) REFI : $44.35M LADR : $400.28M
Gross Profit (TTM) REFI : $42.41M LADR : $284.72M
EBITDA (TTM) REFI : $8.16M LADR : $276.22M

Return for Risk

REFI vs. LADR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REFI

REFI Risk / Return Rank: 27
REFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
REFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
REFI Omega Ratio Rank: 26
REFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
REFI Martin Ratio Rank: 26

LADR

LADR Risk / Return Rank: 47
LADR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
LADR Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
LADR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
LADR Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
LADR Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REFI vs. LADR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) and Ladder Capital Corp (LADR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	REFI	LADR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	0.27	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.24	0.49	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.06	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.46	0.33	-0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.82	0.73	-1.56

REFI vs. LADR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REFI Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the LADR Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REFI and LADR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

REFI vs. LADR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REFI drawdown since its inception was -26.55%, smaller than the maximum LADR drawdown of -81.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REFI and LADR.

Drawdown Indicators

	REFI	LADR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.55%	-81.63%	+55.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.71%	-14.68%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.25%	-20.22%	+0.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.97%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-81.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.63%	-9.32%	-6.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.93%	-18.28%	+8.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.28%	6.66%	+1.62%

Volatility

REFI vs. LADR - Volatility Comparison

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) at 5.72%. This indicates that REFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LADR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REFI	LADR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.25%	5.72%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.18%	14.53%	+1.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.78%	18.39%	+5.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.32%	24.76%	-0.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.32%	48.24%	-23.92%

Dividends

REFI vs. LADR - Dividend Comparison

REFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.42%, more than LADR's 9.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LADR Ladder Capital Corp	9.02%	8.37%	8.22%	7.99%	8.76%	6.67%	9.61%	7.54%	9.92%	8.91%	9.37%	17.91%
REFI Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.	16.42%	15.33%	13.36%	13.41%	13.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REFI and LADR in my portfolio?

REFI and LADR have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REFI or LADR?

REFI has higher volatility (6.25%) compared to LADR (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REFI dropped -26.55% vs LADR's -81.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LADR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.