REFI vs. FSTR
REFI (Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.) and FSTR (L.B. Foster Company) are both stocks. REFI operates in REIT - Mortgage (Real Estate), while FSTR operates in Railroads (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, REFI returned 4.70%/yr vs 46.67%/yr for FSTR. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
REFI vs. FSTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REFI achieves a -4.13% return, which is significantly lower than FSTR's 57.70% return.
REFI
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -6.08%
- YTD
- -4.13%
- 6M
- -2.29%
- 1Y
- -8.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSTR
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- 38.44%
- YTD
- 57.70%
- 6M
- 63.21%
- 1Y
- 123.92%
- 3Y*
- 46.67%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
REFI vs. FSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REFI Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. | -4.13% | -8.70% | 8.69% | 23.70% | 3.35% | 0.97% |
FSTR L.B. Foster Company | 57.70% | 0.19% | 22.33% | 127.17% | -29.60% | -10.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between REFI and FSTR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021 | 0.20 |
Over the past year, REFI and FSTR have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
REFI:
$242.34M
FSTR:
$449.82M
REFI:
$226.63
FSTR:
$1.04
REFI:
0.05
FSTR:
41.03
REFI:
0.00
FSTR:
0.06
REFI:
5.46
FSTR:
0.81
REFI:
0.00
FSTR:
2.59
REFI:
$44.35M
FSTR:
$563.36M
REFI:
$42.41M
FSTR:
$119.30M
REFI:
$8.16M
FSTR:
$37.88M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REFI vs. FSTR — Risk / Return Rank
REFI
FSTR
REFI vs. FSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) and L.B. Foster Company (FSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REFI | FSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | 3.02 | -3.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | 4.31 | -4.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.51 | -0.56 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 8.13 | -8.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 21.90 | -23.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REFI | FSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.38 | 3.02 | -3.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.11 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
REFI vs. FSTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REFI drawdown since its inception was -26.55%, smaller than the maximum FSTR drawdown of -84.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REFI and FSTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REFI | FSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.55% | -84.47% | +57.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.71% | -15.38% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.25% | -45.90% | +26.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -53.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.89% | -24.55% | +7.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -41.82% | +31.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.83% | 5.71% | +2.12% |
Volatility
REFI vs. FSTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) is 8.00%, while L.B. Foster Company (FSTR) has a volatility of 21.67%. This indicates that REFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REFI | FSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.00% | 21.67% | -13.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.79% | 31.04% | -14.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.38% | 41.30% | -17.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.31% | 41.58% | -17.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.31% | 48.36% | -24.05% |
Dividends
REFI vs. FSTR - Dividend Comparison
REFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.67%, while FSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTR L.B. Foster Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 1.17% |
REFI Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. | 16.67% | 15.33% | 13.36% | 13.41% | 13.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
REFI vs. FSTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. and L.B. Foster Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
REFI and FSTR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSTR has higher volatility (21.67%) compared to REFI (8.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REFI dropped -26.55% vs FSTR's -84.47%.
FSTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REFI and FSTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer