PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REFI vs. WPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

REFI vs. WPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) and W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REFI achieves a -4.13% return, which is significantly lower than WPC's 16.24% return.


REFI

1D
0.18%
1M
-6.08%
YTD
-4.13%
6M
-2.29%
1Y
-8.83%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
10Y*

WPC

1D
1.26%
1M
1.64%
YTD
16.24%
6M
14.21%
1Y
25.31%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
5.70%
10Y*
7.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REFI vs. WPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
REFI
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
-4.13%-8.70%8.69%23.70%3.35%0.97%
WPC
W. P. Carey Inc.
16.24%24.99%-10.59%-7.93%0.47%4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between REFI and WPC is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021

0.26

The correlation between REFI and WPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.31 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

REFI:

$242.34M

WPC:

$16.35B

EPS

REFI:

$226.63

WPC:

$2.34

PE Ratio

REFI:

0.05

WPC:

31.58

PEG Ratio

REFI:

0.00

WPC:

16.88

PS Ratio

REFI:

5.46

WPC:

10.66

PB Ratio

REFI:

0.00

WPC:

1.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

REFI:

$44.35M

WPC:

$1.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

REFI:

$42.41M

WPC:

$942.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

REFI:

$8.16M

WPC:

$1.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REFI vs. WPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REFI
REFI Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
REFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
REFI Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
REFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
REFI Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

WPC
WPC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
WPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
WPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REFI vs. WPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) and W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REFIWPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.38

1.58

-1.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.38

2.19

-2.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.28

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

2.51

-3.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.30

7.67

-8.96

REFI vs. WPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REFI Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the WPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REFI and WPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REFIWPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

1.58

-1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.46

-0.26

Drawdowns

REFI vs. WPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REFI drawdown since its inception was -26.55%, smaller than the maximum WPC drawdown of -52.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REFI and WPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REFIWPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.55%

-52.45%

+25.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.71%

-9.71%

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.25%

-27.07%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.89%

-1.63%

-15.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.87%

-10.28%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.83%

3.17%

+4.66%

Volatility

REFI vs. WPC - Volatility Comparison

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) has a higher volatility of 8.00% compared to W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC) at 4.03%. This indicates that REFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REFIWPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.00%

4.03%

+3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.79%

12.06%

+4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.38%

16.09%

+7.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.31%

20.63%

+3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.31%

25.79%

-1.48%

Dividends

REFI vs. WPC - Dividend Comparison

REFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.67%, more than WPC's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REFI
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
16.67%15.33%13.36%13.41%13.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WPC
W. P. Carey Inc.
4.96%5.62%6.41%7.93%5.43%5.12%5.91%5.17%6.26%7.26%6.65%6.48%

Financials

REFI vs. WPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. and W. P. Carey Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober202600
(REFI) Total Revenue
(WPC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


REFI and WPC have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REFI has higher volatility (8.00%) compared to WPC (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REFI dropped -26.55% vs WPC's -52.45%.

WPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REFI and WPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer