FSTR vs. HWKN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about L.B. Foster Company (FSTR) and Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN).

Performance

FSTR vs. HWKN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L.B. Foster Company (FSTR) and Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FSTR vs. HWKN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSTR L.B. Foster Company	3.53%	0.19%	22.33%	127.17%	-29.60%	-8.64%	-22.34%	21.89%	-41.44%	99.63%
HWKN Hawkins, Inc.	8.27%	16.45%	75.46%	84.66%	-0.81%	53.05%	16.44%	14.35%	19.23%	-33.43%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FSTR : $300.23M HWKN : $3.20B
EPS FSTR : $0.70 HWKN : $3.96
PE Ratio FSTR : 40.05 HWKN : 38.83
PEG Ratio FSTR : 0.06 HWKN : 1.92
PS Ratio FSTR : 0.56 HWKN : 3.01
PB Ratio FSTR : 1.71 HWKN : 6.17
Total Revenue (TTM) FSTR : $540.01M HWKN : $1.06B
Gross Profit (TTM) FSTR : $113.75M HWKN : $243.06M
EBITDA (TTM) FSTR : $31.81M HWKN : $159.57M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTR achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly lower than HWKN's 8.27% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTR has underperformed HWKN with an annualized return of 4.72%, while HWKN has yielded a comparatively higher 25.40% annualized return.

FSTR

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -9.21%
• YTD: 3.53%
• 6M: 3.53%
• 1Y: 41.77%
• 3Y*: 34.45%
• 5Y*: 9.16%
• 10Y*: 4.72%

HWKN

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: 3.02%
• YTD: 8.27%
• 6M: -15.70%
• 1Y: 45.78%
• 3Y*: 53.10%
• 5Y*: 36.65%
• 10Y*: 25.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FSTR vs. HWKN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTR

FSTR Risk / Return Rank: 77
FSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 82

HWKN

HWKN Risk / Return Rank: 72
HWKN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
HWKN Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
HWKN Omega Ratio Rank: 72
HWKN Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
HWKN Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTR vs. HWKN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L.B. Foster Company (FSTR) and Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSTR	HWKN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	1.21	-0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.75	+0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.23	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	1.31	+1.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.61	2.92	+3.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSTR vs. HWKN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the HWKN Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTR and HWKN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSTR	HWKN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	1.21	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	1.01	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	0.68	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.39	-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between FSTR and HWKN is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FSTR vs. HWKN - Dividend Comparison

FSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HWKN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSTR L.B. Foster Company	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.88%	1.17%
HWKN Hawkins, Inc.	0.49%	0.52%	0.55%	0.88%	1.45%	1.28%	1.78%	2.01%	2.17%	2.44%	1.52%	2.18%

Drawdowns

FSTR vs. HWKN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTR drawdown since its inception was -84.47%, which is greater than HWKN's maximum drawdown of -44.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTR and HWKN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSTR	HWKN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.47%	-44.76%	-39.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.38%	-34.79%	+19.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.25%	-34.79%	-18.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.39%	-44.76%	-25.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.47%	-16.53%	-33.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.84%	-15.73%	-26.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.89%	15.56%	-9.67%

Volatility

FSTR vs. HWKN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L.B. Foster Company (FSTR) is 7.59%, while Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) has a volatility of 13.50%. This indicates that FSTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HWKN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSTR	HWKN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.59%	13.50%	-5.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.79%	29.94%	-7.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.63%	38.02%	+0.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.22%	36.37%	+3.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.35%	37.48%	+11.87%

Financials

FSTR vs. HWKN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between L.B. Foster Company and Hawkins, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FSTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, L.B. Foster Company reported a gross profit of 31.64M and revenue of 160.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.7%.

HWKN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hawkins, Inc. reported a gross profit of 50.81M and revenue of 244.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.8%.

FSTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, L.B. Foster Company reported an operating income of 7.84M and revenue of 160.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

HWKN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hawkins, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.56M and revenue of 244.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

FSTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, L.B. Foster Company reported a net income of 2.42M and revenue of 160.37M, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.

HWKN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hawkins, Inc. reported a net income of 14.31M and revenue of 244.08M, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.