FSTR vs. HWKN
FSTR (L.B. Foster Company) and HWKN (Hawkins, Inc.) are both stocks. FSTR operates in Railroads (Industrials), while HWKN operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, FSTR returned 13.49%/yr vs 23.45%/yr for HWKN. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FSTR vs. HWKN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSTR achieves a 53.69% return, which is significantly higher than HWKN's 9.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTR has underperformed HWKN with an annualized return of 13.49%, while HWKN has yielded a comparatively higher 23.45% annualized return.
FSTR
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 13.17%
- YTD
- 53.69%
- 6M
- 51.67%
- 1Y
- 115.39%
- 3Y*
- 45.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.24%
- 10Y*
- 13.49%
HWKN
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- 9.16%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- 1Y
- 16.99%
- 3Y*
- 46.75%
- 5Y*
- 37.13%
- 10Y*
- 23.45%
FSTR vs. HWKN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTR L.B. Foster Company | 53.69% | 0.19% | 22.33% | 127.17% | -29.60% | -8.64% | -22.34% | 21.89% | -41.44% | 99.63% |
HWKN Hawkins, Inc. | 9.16% | 16.45% | 75.46% | 84.66% | -0.81% | 53.05% | 16.44% | 14.35% | 19.23% | -33.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSTR and HWKN is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 1993 | 0.20 |
The correlation between FSTR and HWKN shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FSTR:
$438.39M
HWKN:
$3.23B
FSTR:
$1.04
HWKN:
$3.91
FSTR:
39.99
HWKN:
39.54
FSTR:
0.06
HWKN:
3.06
FSTR:
0.79
HWKN:
2.98
FSTR:
2.52
HWKN:
6.05
FSTR:
$563.36M
HWKN:
$1.08B
FSTR:
$119.30M
HWKN:
$245.06M
FSTR:
$37.88M
HWKN:
$162.38M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSTR vs. HWKN — Risk / Return Rank
FSTR
HWKN
FSTR vs. HWKN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L.B. Foster Company (FSTR) and Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSTR | HWKN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.11 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.55 | 0.49 | +7.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.29 | 1.02 | +19.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSTR | HWKN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 0.47 | +2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 1.03 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.63 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.39 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
FSTR vs. HWKN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTR drawdown since its inception was -84.47%, which is greater than HWKN's maximum drawdown of -44.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTR and HWKN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSTR | HWKN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.47% | -44.76% | -39.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.38% | -34.79% | +19.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.90% | -34.79% | -11.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.25% | -34.79% | -18.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.39% | -44.76% | -25.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.47% | -15.84% | -10.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.82% | -15.72% | -26.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.71% | 16.66% | -10.95% |
Volatility
FSTR vs. HWKN - Volatility Comparison
L.B. Foster Company (FSTR) has a higher volatility of 14.04% compared to Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) at 8.97%. This indicates that FSTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWKN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSTR | HWKN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.04% | 8.97% | +5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.10% | 26.45% | +4.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.40% | 36.52% | +4.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.59% | 36.40% | +5.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.36% | 37.48% | +10.88% |
Dividends
FSTR vs. HWKN - Dividend Comparison
FSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HWKN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTR L.B. Foster Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 1.17% |
HWKN Hawkins, Inc. | 0.49% | 0.52% | 0.55% | 0.88% | 1.45% | 1.28% | 1.78% | 2.01% | 2.17% | 2.44% | 1.52% | 2.18% |
Financials
FSTR vs. HWKN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between L.B. Foster Company and Hawkins, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FSTR vs. HWKN - Profitability Comparison
FSTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L.B. Foster Company reported a gross profit of 25.70M and revenue of 121.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.
HWKN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hawkins, Inc. reported a gross profit of 54.24M and revenue of 265.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.4%.
FSTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L.B. Foster Company reported an operating income of 2.05M and revenue of 121.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.7%.
HWKN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hawkins, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.46M and revenue of 265.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.
FSTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L.B. Foster Company reported a net income of 1.50M and revenue of 121.14M, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
HWKN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hawkins, Inc. reported a net income of 15.46M and revenue of 265.91M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FSTR and HWKN have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSTR has higher volatility (14.04%) compared to HWKN (8.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTR dropped -84.47% vs HWKN's -44.76%.
FSTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSTR and HWKN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer