PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REET vs. FDLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REET vs. FDLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly higher than FDLO's 3.88% return.


REET

1D
-0.88%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
8.47%
6M
9.73%
1Y
11.75%
3Y*
9.05%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
4.04%

FDLO

1D
-0.68%
1M
0.03%
YTD
3.88%
6M
3.86%
1Y
13.32%
3Y*
13.93%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REET vs. FDLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
8.47%7.97%2.65%10.28%-24.10%32.43%-10.48%24.42%-5.27%7.48%
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
3.88%11.77%16.06%16.38%-10.38%24.00%12.19%31.10%-0.26%20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between REET and FDLO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.66

The correlation between REET and FDLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

REET vs. FDLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REET
FDLO

Real Estate

99.8%
2.2%

Financial Services

0.2%
12.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Energy

-

3.2%

Healthcare

-

9.7%

Industrials

-

9.2%

Technology

-

33.8%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Real Estate

REET
99.8%
FDLO
2.2%

Financial Services

REET
0.2%
FDLO
12.1%

Basic Materials

REET

-

FDLO
1.7%

Communication Services

REET

-

FDLO
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

REET

-

FDLO
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

REET

-

FDLO
4.7%

Energy

REET

-

FDLO
3.2%

Healthcare

REET

-

FDLO
9.7%

Industrials

REET

-

FDLO
9.2%

Technology

REET

-

FDLO
33.8%

Utilities

REET

-

FDLO
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REET vs. FDLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REET
REET Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FDLO
FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REET vs. FDLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REETFDLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.27

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

1.87

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

8.13

-3.45

REET vs. FDLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REET Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the FDLO Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REET and FDLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REETFDLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

1.52

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.76

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.82

-0.57

Drawdowns

REET vs. FDLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, which is greater than FDLO's maximum drawdown of -34.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and FDLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REETFDLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.59%

-34.35%

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-7.13%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

-13.68%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.11%

-19.23%

-12.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-1.97%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.78%

-3.38%

-6.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

1.64%

+0.88%

Volatility

REET vs. FDLO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) at 2.17%. This indicates that REET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REETFDLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

2.17%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

6.50%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

8.80%

+3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

13.07%

+3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

15.50%

+3.35%

REET vs. FDLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FDLO's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

REET vs. FDLO - Dividend Comparison

REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than FDLO's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
1.38%1.37%1.40%1.35%1.49%1.11%1.38%1.55%1.76%1.61%0.55%0.00%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
3.41%3.67%3.64%3.27%2.43%3.18%2.65%5.25%5.73%3.84%5.37%3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


REET and FDLO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REET has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to FDLO (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REET dropped -44.59% vs FDLO's -34.35%.

On 5-year performance, FDLO leads with 9.84% vs 1.87% for REET. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, FDLO has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDLO has performed better with a 9.84% return vs 1.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDLO.

REET has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 1.38% for FDLO.

REET is categorized as REIT, while FDLO is Volatility Hedged Equity. REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while FDLO tracks Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for REET and 0.29% for FDLO.

FDLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REET and FDLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer