RDYY vs. DURA
RDYY (YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF) and DURA (VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while DURA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index. RDYY is actively managed, while DURA is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. RDYY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for DURA.
Performance
RDYY vs. DURA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDYY achieves a -16.60% return, which is significantly lower than DURA's 15.02% return.
RDYY
- 1D
- -5.19%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- 6M
- -15.11%
- YTD
- -16.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DURA
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 10.84%
- YTD
- 15.02%
- 1Y
- 19.77%
- 3Y*
- 10.28%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- —
RDYY vs. DURA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF | -16.60% | -5.31% |
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 15.02% | 2.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDYY and DURA is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDYY vs. DURA — Risk / Return Rank
RDYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DURA
RDYY vs. DURA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF (RDYY) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDYY | DURA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDYY vs. DURA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDYY drawdown since its inception was -51.16%, which is greater than DURA's maximum drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDYY and DURA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDYY | DURA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.16% | -33.15% | -18.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.87% | -0.35% | -28.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.70% | -3.89% | -24.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.18% | — |
Volatility
RDYY vs. DURA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDYY | DURA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.59% | 14.82% | +40.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.59% | 13.67% | +41.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.59% | 16.92% | +38.67% |
RDYY vs. DURA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DURA's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDYY vs. DURA - Dividend Comparison
RDYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 99.32%, more than DURA's 3.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 3.16% | 3.59% | 3.33% | 3.58% | 3.01% | 2.89% | 3.49% | 3.83% | 0.66% |
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF | 99.32% | 25.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDYY and DURA have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DURA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DURA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RDYY.
RDYY has the higher dividend yield at 99.32%, compared with 3.16% for DURA.
RDYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while DURA is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RDYY and 0.29% for DURA.
Find the right allocation for RDYY and DURA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer