RDYY vs. BSMU
RDYY (YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF) and BSMU (Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while BSMU is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco Bulletshares Municipal Bond 2030 Index. RDYY is actively managed, while BSMU is passively managed. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RDYY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMU.
Performance
RDYY vs. BSMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDYY achieves a -34.23% return, which is significantly lower than BSMU's -0.34% return.
RDYY
- 1D
- -18.48%
- 1M
- -23.75%
- 6M
- -17.27%
- YTD
- -34.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BSMU
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- 2.49%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- -1.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $923.23K | $1.24M | $1.23M | |
| $1.30M | $1.28M | $997.83K |
RDYY vs. BSMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF | -34.23% | -5.31% |
BSMU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF | -0.34% | 1.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDYY and BSMU is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDYY vs. BSMU — Risk / Return Rank
RDYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSMU
RDYY vs. BSMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF (RDYY) and Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDYY | BSMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.91 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDYY vs. BSMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDYY drawdown since its inception was -51.16%, which is greater than BSMU's maximum drawdown of -19.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDYY and BSMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDYY | BSMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.16% | -19.48% | -31.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.91% | -5.69% | -38.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.88% | -8.10% | -20.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.79% | — |
Volatility
RDYY vs. BSMU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDYY | BSMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.45% | 2.14% | +56.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.45% | 4.81% | +53.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.45% | 4.79% | +53.66% |
RDYY vs. BSMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMU's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDYY vs. BSMU - Dividend Comparison
RDYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 133.67%, more than BSMU's 2.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.81% | 2.82% | 2.92% | 2.66% | 2.16% | 1.60% | 0.28% |
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF | 133.67% | 25.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDYY and BSMU have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSMU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSMU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RDYY.
RDYY has the higher dividend yield at 133.67%, compared with 2.81% for BSMU.
RDYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BSMU is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RDYY and 0.18% for BSMU.
Find the right allocation for RDYY and BSMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer