RDYY vs. GAA
RDYY (YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF) and GAA (Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while GAA is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RDYY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GAA.
Performance
RDYY vs. GAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDYY achieves a -34.23% return, which is significantly lower than GAA's 8.59% return.
RDYY
- 1D
- -18.48%
- 1M
- -23.75%
- 6M
- -17.27%
- YTD
- -34.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GAA
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 1Y
- 18.83%
- 3Y*
- 12.44%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- 7.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $220.71K | $181.13K | $218.77K | |
| $1.30M | $1.28M | $997.83K |
RDYY vs. GAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF | -34.23% | -5.31% |
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 8.59% | 4.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDYY and GAA is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDYY vs. GAA — Risk / Return Rank
RDYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GAA
RDYY vs. GAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF (RDYY) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDYY | GAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDYY vs. GAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDYY drawdown since its inception was -51.16%, which is greater than GAA's maximum drawdown of -26.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDYY and GAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDYY | GAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.16% | -26.57% | -24.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.91% | -1.39% | -42.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.88% | -3.82% | -25.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.62% | — |
Volatility
RDYY vs. GAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDYY | GAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.45% | 9.42% | +49.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.45% | 11.31% | +47.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.45% | 11.09% | +47.36% |
RDYY vs. GAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GAA's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDYY vs. GAA - Dividend Comparison
RDYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 133.67%, more than GAA's 3.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 3.50% | 4.24% | 3.88% | 3.73% | 6.05% | 4.21% | 2.73% | 3.32% | 3.01% | 2.36% | 2.82% | 2.49% |
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF | 133.67% | 25.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDYY and GAA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GAA is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GAA is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RDYY.
RDYY has the higher dividend yield at 133.67%, compared with 3.50% for GAA.
RDYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while GAA is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RDYY and 0.40% for GAA.
Find the right allocation for RDYY and GAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer