RDYY vs. ALTL
RDYY (YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF) and ALTL (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while ALTL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index. RDYY is actively managed, while ALTL is passively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RDYY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ALTL.
Performance
RDYY vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDYY achieves a -23.45% return, which is significantly lower than ALTL's 15.79% return.
RDYY
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- 14.72%
- YTD
- -23.45%
- 6M
- -22.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALTL
- 1D
- -3.95%
- 1M
- 6.17%
- YTD
- 15.79%
- 6M
- 15.53%
- 1Y
- 39.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.68%
- 5Y*
- 5.11%
- 10Y*
- —
RDYY vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF | -23.45% | -5.31% |
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF | 15.79% | 6.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDYY and ALTL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDYY vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank
RDYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ALTL
RDYY vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF (RDYY) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDYY | ALTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.55 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDYY vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDYY drawdown since its inception was -51.16%, which is greater than ALTL's maximum drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDYY and ALTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDYY | ALTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.16% | -31.91% | -19.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.72% | -3.95% | -30.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.76% | -11.50% | -17.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.90% | — |
Volatility
RDYY vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDYY | ALTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.93% | 20.53% | +34.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.93% | 18.97% | +35.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.93% | 20.47% | +34.46% |
RDYY vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ALTL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDYY vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison
RDYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 92.82%, more than ALTL's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF | 0.88% | 0.95% | 1.56% | 1.28% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.75% |
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF | 92.82% | 25.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDYY and ALTL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ALTL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ALTL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RDYY.
RDYY has the higher dividend yield at 92.82%, compared with 0.88% for ALTL.
RDYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while ALTL is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RDYY and 0.60% for ALTL.
Find the right allocation for RDYY and ALTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer