RDWU vs. TSLZ

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

RDWU (T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDWU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Redwire Corporation (RDW), while TSLZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. RDWU is passively managed, while TSLZ is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.42, they often move in opposite directions. RDWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLZ.

Performance

RDWU vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RDWU

• 1D: -14.09%
• 1M: -68.04%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TSLZ

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: 21.75%
• YTD: 14.62%
• 6M: 32.94%
• 1Y: -52.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDWU vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RDWU T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF	-68.46%
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF	1.38%

Correlation

The correlation between RDWU and TSLZ is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026	-0.42

Return for Risk

RDWU vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDWU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TSLZ

TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 4
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDWU vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDWU	TSLZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.61	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.60	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.93	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.72	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.92	—

Drawdowns

RDWU vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDWU drawdown since its inception was -84.34%, smaller than the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDWU and TSLZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDWU	TSLZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.34%	-99.11%	+14.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-72.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.34%	-98.80%	+14.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.55%	-75.74%	+19.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	57.36%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RDWU	TSLZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	27.35%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	56.82%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	263.62%	86.63%	+176.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	263.62%	116.81%	+146.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	263.62%	116.81%	+146.81%

RDWU vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDWU vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison

RDWU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
RDWU T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF	0.60%	0.69%	2.08%	12.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDWU and TSLZ in my portfolio?

RDWU and TSLZ have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RDWU or TSLZ?

On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDWU or TSLZ?

TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for RDWU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDWU or TSLZ?

TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for RDWU.

What is the main difference between RDWU and TSLZ?

RDWU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLZ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for RDWU and 1.05% for TSLZ.