PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLWG vs. BABU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLWG vs. BABU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG) and Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF (BABU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GLWG

1D
0.42%
1M
46.27%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BABU

1D
-5.41%
1M
-11.25%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLWG vs. BABU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GLWG and BABU is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLWG vs. BABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG) and Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF (BABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GLWG vs. BABU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLWGBABUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

8.78

-1.05

+9.83

Drawdowns

GLWG vs. BABU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLWG drawdown since its inception was -29.53%, smaller than the maximum BABU drawdown of -49.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLWG and BABU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLWGBABUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.53%

-49.17%

+19.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.32%

-44.84%

+34.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-35.05%

+24.34%

Volatility

GLWG vs. BABU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLWGBABUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

151.06%

82.22%

+68.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

151.06%

82.22%

+68.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

151.06%

82.22%

+68.84%

GLWG vs. BABU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BABU's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLWG vs. BABU - Dividend Comparison

GLWG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GLWG and BABU have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for BABU.

BABU has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for GLWG.

GLWG tracks Corning Incorporated (GLW), while BABU tracks Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GLWG and 0.97% for BABU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLWG and BABU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer