GLWG vs. CRMU

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

GLWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF) and CRMU (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - GLWG tracks the Corning Incorporated (GLW) while CRMU tracks the Critical Metals Corp. (CRML). Both are passively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

GLWG vs. CRMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GLWG

• 1D: -7.67%
• 1M: -6.90%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRMU

• 1D: -13.41%
• 1M: -47.11%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLWG vs. CRMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GLWG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF	40.63%
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF	-59.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GLWG and CRMU is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2026	0.50

Return for Risk

GLWG vs. CRMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

GLWG vs. CRMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLWG drawdown since its inception was -51.09%, smaller than the maximum CRMU drawdown of -79.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLWG and CRMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLWG	CRMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.09%	-79.97%	+28.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.09%	-79.97%	+28.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.74%	-49.38%	+33.64%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GLWG	CRMU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	175.40%	234.92%	-59.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	175.40%	234.92%	-59.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	175.40%	234.92%	-59.52%

GLWG vs. CRMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GLWG and CRMU have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

GLWG vs. CRMU - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLWG nor CRMU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLWG and CRMU in my portfolio?

GLWG and CRMU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GLWG or CRMU?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLWG or CRMU?

GLWG and CRMU have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLWG or CRMU?

GLWG and CRMU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GLWG and CRMU?

GLWG tracks Corning Incorporated (GLW), while CRMU tracks Critical Metals Corp. (CRML).