RDWU vs. BOEG
RDWU (T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF) and BOEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. RDWU is passively managed, while BOEG is actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RDWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BOEG.
Performance
RDWU vs. BOEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RDWU
- 1D
- -19.50%
- 1M
- -64.50%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOEG
- 1D
- -3.33%
- 1M
- -12.16%
- 6M
- -32.81%
- YTD
- -13.35%
- 1Y
- -29.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDWU vs. BOEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RDWU T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF | -83.58% |
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF | -24.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDWU and BOEG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDWU vs. BOEG — Risk / Return Rank
RDWU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BOEG
RDWU vs. BOEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDWU | BOEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.96 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.65 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDWU vs. BOEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDWU drawdown since its inception was -91.85%, which is greater than BOEG's maximum drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDWU and BOEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDWU | BOEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.85% | -46.47% | -45.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -46.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.85% | -34.94% | -56.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.47% | -20.22% | -40.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 24.74% | — |
Volatility
RDWU vs. BOEG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDWU | BOEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 47.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 252.73% | 63.88% | +188.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 252.73% | 63.79% | +188.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 252.73% | 63.79% | +188.94% |
RDWU vs. BOEG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BOEG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDWU vs. BOEG - Dividend Comparison
Neither RDWU nor BOEG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RDWU and BOEG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BOEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BOEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for RDWU.
RDWU and BOEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for RDWU and 0.75% for BOEG.
Find the right allocation for RDWU and BOEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer