PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOEG vs. COTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOEG vs. COTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOEG achieves a -8.42% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 15.71% return.


BOEG

1D
-6.00%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
-8.42%
6M
0.96%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COTG

1D
1.56%
1M
-12.41%
YTD
15.71%
6M
-0.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOEG vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BOEG and COTG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOEG vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BOEG vs. COTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOEGCOTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

-0.32

+0.29

Drawdowns

BOEG vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOEG drawdown since its inception was -46.47%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOEG and COTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOEGCOTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.47%

-25.69%

-20.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.24%

-24.53%

-6.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.99%

-8.26%

-10.73%

Volatility

BOEG vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOEGCOTGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.18%

40.73%

+22.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.18%

40.73%

+22.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.18%

40.73%

+22.45%

BOEG vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BOEG and COTG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

BOEG vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOEG nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BOEG and COTG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BOEG and COTG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

BOEG and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOEG and COTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer