RDWU vs. AAPX
RDWU (T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF) and AAPX (T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from T-Rex. RDWU is passively managed, while AAPX is actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RDWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for AAPX.
Performance
RDWU vs. AAPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RDWU
- 1D
- 31.87%
- 1M
- 376.22%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPX
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 18.76%
- YTD
- 22.31%
- 6M
- 12.90%
- 1Y
- 100.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDWU vs. AAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RDWU T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF | 71.70% |
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 36.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDWU and AAPX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDWU vs. AAPX — Risk / Return Rank
RDWU
AAPX
RDWU vs. AAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDWU | AAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.53 | +1.00 |
Drawdowns
RDWU vs. AAPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDWU drawdown since its inception was -66.94%, which is greater than AAPX's maximum drawdown of -58.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDWU and AAPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDWU | AAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.94% | -58.55% | -8.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -30.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.27% | -2.66% | -32.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.07% | -19.33% | -23.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.66% | — |
Volatility
RDWU vs. AAPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDWU | AAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 255.53% | 44.98% | +210.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 255.53% | 54.58% | +200.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 255.53% | 54.58% | +200.95% |
RDWU vs. AAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AAPX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDWU vs. AAPX - Dividend Comparison
RDWU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 0.54% | 0.67% | 21.46% |
RDWU T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDWU and AAPX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AAPX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAPX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for RDWU.
AAPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for RDWU.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for RDWU and 1.05% for AAPX.
Find the right allocation for RDWU and AAPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer