PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDVY vs. HSCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDVY vs. HSCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDVY achieves a 13.41% return, which is significantly higher than HSCZ's 10.99% return. Over the past 10 years, RDVY has outperformed HSCZ with an annualized return of 16.29%, while HSCZ has yielded a comparatively lower 12.35% annualized return.


RDVY

1D
1.11%
1M
5.69%
YTD
13.41%
6M
12.60%
1Y
31.20%
3Y*
20.46%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
16.29%

HSCZ

1D
0.71%
1M
0.48%
YTD
10.99%
6M
13.18%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
12.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDVY vs. HSCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
13.41%18.90%16.41%20.38%-13.27%31.14%13.47%37.71%-9.92%22.75%
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
10.99%25.74%12.89%17.03%-11.46%17.75%6.40%27.89%-13.99%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between RDVY and HSCZ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.69

The correlation between RDVY and HSCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

RDVY vs. HSCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RDVY
HSCZ

Financial Services

33.5%
13.3%

Technology

26.9%
10.8%

Industrials

13.6%
24.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
10.8%

Communication Services

5.5%
3.1%

Healthcare

3.9%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
3.9%

Energy

2.4%
3.8%

Utilities

1.4%
2.4%

Basic Materials

-

10.8%

Real Estate

-

9.5%

Financial Services

RDVY
33.5%
HSCZ
13.3%

Technology

RDVY
26.9%
HSCZ
10.8%

Industrials

RDVY
13.6%
HSCZ
24.4%

Consumer Cyclical

RDVY
10.9%
HSCZ
10.8%

Communication Services

RDVY
5.5%
HSCZ
3.1%

Healthcare

RDVY
3.9%
HSCZ
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

RDVY
3.4%
HSCZ
3.9%

Energy

RDVY
2.4%
HSCZ
3.8%

Utilities

RDVY
1.4%
HSCZ
2.4%

Basic Materials

RDVY

-

HSCZ
10.8%

Real Estate

RDVY

-

HSCZ
9.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDVY vs. HSCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

HSCZ
HSCZ Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
HSCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HSCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDVY vs. HSCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDVYHSCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.45

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

2.95

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.71

12.57

+1.14

RDVY vs. HSCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDVY Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the HSCZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDVY and HSCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDVY vs. HSCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDVY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, which is greater than HSCZ's maximum drawdown of -34.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVY and HSCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDVYHSCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.60%

-34.89%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-9.61%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.11%

-12.81%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.32%

-20.11%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.60%

-34.89%

-5.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-4.64%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.25%

-0.10%

Volatility

RDVY vs. HSCZ - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) at 4.08%. This indicates that RDVY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDVYHSCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

4.08%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.50%

9.68%

+1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

11.60%

+2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.98%

13.52%

+5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.13%

15.68%

+5.45%

RDVY vs. HSCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDVY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HSCZ's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDVY vs. HSCZ - Dividend Comparison

RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than HSCZ's 2.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
2.93%3.25%3.26%2.98%26.91%2.90%1.46%4.66%6.15%2.52%2.57%1.75%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.89%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDVY and HSCZ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDVY has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to HSCZ (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVY dropped -40.60% vs HSCZ's -34.89%.

On 10-year performance, RDVY leads with 16.29% vs 12.35% for HSCZ. On fees, HSCZ is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, HSCZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 16.29% return vs 12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HSCZ is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RDVY.

HSCZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.89% for RDVY.

RDVY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HSCZ is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. RDVY tracks NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers, while HSCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RDVY and 0.43% for HSCZ.

HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDVY and HSCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer