PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDVT vs. VITL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RDVT vs. VITL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDVT achieves a -6.08% return, which is significantly higher than VITL's -68.50% return.


RDVT

1D
1.00%
1M
7.63%
YTD
-6.08%
6M
-3.98%
1Y
17.20%
3Y*
36.51%
5Y*
19.97%
10Y*

VITL

1D
0.20%
1M
12.53%
YTD
-68.50%
6M
-68.29%
1Y
-67.42%
3Y*
-10.77%
5Y*
-15.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDVT vs. VITL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
-6.08%58.63%81.27%-13.25%-42.00%52.01%70.54%
VITL
Vital Farms, Inc.
-68.50%-15.26%140.22%5.16%-17.39%-28.64%-28.22%

Correlation

The correlation between RDVT and VITL is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020

0.16

The correlation between RDVT and VITL shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RDVT:

$769.95M

VITL:

$448.55M

EPS

RDVT:

$0.97

VITL:

$1.05

PE Ratio

RDVT:

54.97

VITL:

9.60

PEG Ratio

RDVT:

0.11

VITL:

0.02

PS Ratio

RDVT:

8.24

VITL:

0.59

PB Ratio

RDVT:

7.37

VITL:

1.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

RDVT:

$94.08M

VITL:

$784.41M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RDVT:

$79.25M

VITL:

$276.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

RDVT:

$23.76M

VITL:

$82.41M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDVT vs. VITL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDVT
RDVT Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
RDVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVT Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

VITL
VITL Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
VITL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
VITL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITL Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDVT vs. VITL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDVTVITLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.76

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

-0.80

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.91

-1.43

+2.34

RDVT vs. VITL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDVT Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the VITL Sharpe Ratio of -1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDVT and VITL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDVTVITLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

-1.10

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

-0.28

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

-0.36

+0.39

Drawdowns

RDVT vs. VITL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDVT drawdown since its inception was -90.17%, which is greater than VITL's maximum drawdown of -84.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVT and VITL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDVTVITLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.17%

-84.20%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.11%

-84.20%

+42.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.11%

-84.20%

+42.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.73%

-84.20%

+20.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.98%

-80.81%

+70.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.47%

-47.28%

-3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.92%

47.12%

-28.20%

Volatility

RDVT vs. VITL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) is 15.61%, while Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a volatility of 18.45%. This indicates that RDVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VITL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDVTVITLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.61%

18.45%

-2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.64%

48.11%

-10.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.14%

61.49%

-15.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.36%

54.16%

-4.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.31%

53.74%

+14.57%

Dividends

RDVT vs. VITL - Dividend Comparison

Neither RDVT nor VITL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
0.00%0.53%
VITL
Vital Farms, Inc.
0.00%0.00%

Financials

RDVT vs. VITL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Red Violet, Inc. and Vital Farms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
25.83M
187.16M
(RDVT) Total Revenue
(VITL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RDVT vs. VITL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Red Violet, Inc. and Vital Farms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
85.2%
28.3%
Portfolio components
RDVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported a gross profit of 22.01M and revenue of 25.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.2%.

VITL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 53.01M and revenue of 187.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.3%.

RDVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.44M and revenue of 25.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

VITL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.33M and revenue of 187.16M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.3%.

RDVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported a net income of 4.39M and revenue of 25.83M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.

VITL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported a net income of -1.52M and revenue of 187.16M, resulting in a net margin of -0.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RDVT and VITL have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VITL has higher volatility (18.45%) compared to RDVT (15.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVT dropped -90.17% vs VITL's -84.20%.

RDVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDVT and VITL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer