RDVT vs. SHIP
RDVT (Red Violet, Inc.) and SHIP (Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.) are both stocks. RDVT operates in Software - Application (Technology), while SHIP operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, RDVT returned 23.87%/yr vs 14.11%/yr for SHIP. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RDVT vs. SHIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDVT achieves a 16.75% return, which is significantly lower than SHIP's 60.95% return.
RDVT
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- 20.67%
- 6M
- 32.45%
- YTD
- 16.75%
- 1Y
- 46.36%
- 3Y*
- 47.32%
- 5Y*
- 23.87%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.60%
SHIP
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 58.55%
- YTD
- 60.95%
- 1Y
- 122.81%
- 3Y*
- 47.82%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- -45.38%
- ALL TIME*
- -36.92%
RDVT vs. SHIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDVT Red Violet, Inc. | 16.75% | 58.63% | 81.27% | -13.25% | -42.00% | 52.01% | 41.06% | 174.63% | -76.76% |
SHIP Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. | 60.95% | 38.48% | -3.81% | 61.04% | -36.53% | 70.83% | -93.89% | -92.71% | -45.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDVT and SHIP is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
RDVT:
$938.10M
SHIP:
$304.25M
RDVT:
$0.97
SHIP:
$1.78
RDVT:
68.23
SHIP:
8.09
RDVT:
0.13
SHIP:
0.02
RDVT:
10.23
SHIP:
1.69
RDVT:
9.16
SHIP:
1.04
RDVT:
$94.08M
SHIP:
$176.75M
RDVT:
$79.25M
SHIP:
$79.31M
RDVT:
$23.76M
SHIP:
$96.51M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDVT vs. SHIP — Risk / Return Rank
RDVT
SHIP
RDVT vs. SHIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDVT | SHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.42 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 6.54 | -5.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 14.69 | -12.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDVT vs. SHIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDVT drawdown since its inception was -90.17%, smaller than the maximum SHIP drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVT and SHIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDVT | SHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.17% | -100.00% | +9.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.11% | -18.88% | -23.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.11% | -57.61% | +15.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.73% | -69.11% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -99.98% | +96.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.83% | -86.63% | +36.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.46% | 8.39% | +10.07% |
Volatility
RDVT vs. SHIP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) is 11.06%, while Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) has a volatility of 13.53%. This indicates that RDVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDVT | SHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.06% | 13.53% | -2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.89% | 36.01% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.88% | 43.44% | +2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.32% | 51.56% | -2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.08% | 97.94% | -26.86% |
Dividends
RDVT vs. SHIP - Dividend Comparison
RDVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDVT Red Violet, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHIP Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. | 4.02% | 3.58% | 10.58% | 1.28% | 25.23% |
Financials
RDVT vs. SHIP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Red Violet, Inc. and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RDVT vs. SHIP - Profitability Comparison
RDVT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported a gross profit of 22.01M and revenue of 25.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.2%.
SHIP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 19.29M and revenue of 42.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.
RDVT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.44M and revenue of 25.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.
SHIP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 11.75M and revenue of 42.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.4%.
RDVT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported a net income of 4.39M and revenue of 25.83M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.
SHIP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 9.50M and revenue of 42.85M, resulting in a net margin of 22.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RDVT and SHIP have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHIP has higher volatility (13.53%) compared to RDVT (11.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVT dropped -90.17% vs SHIP's -100.00%.
SHIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDVT and SHIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer